The Rust Belt is so over ‘populist’ Trump

As his support crumbles, he’s dragging down GOP

The so-called Rust Belt made Donald Trump president of the United States, and now it could help take away his immunity by House majority.

Republican Troy Balderson may have snuck by Democrat Danny O’Connor to win the special election in Ohio’s 12th congressional district. But the two candidates were separated by less than 1 percentage point Wednesday with more than 8,000 absentee and provisional ballots left to count, in a district that Republican Rep. Pat Tiberi won by nearly 37 points in 2016. That should be no comfort to the GOP.

You can’t expect a newbie to perform like an incumbent, but both Mitt Romney and Donald Trump carried the district by 11 percentage points. There are 68 GOP-held U.S. House districts that lean more Democratic than Ohio’s 12th. Democrats only need to pick up 23 to grab the majority and subpoena power over the Trump administration.

The GOP still has what could be insurmountable advantages heading into November. But what’s going on in the Rust Belt in general should have Republicans praying for intervention from their higher power, Vladimir Putin. Trump’s numbers in the key Midwest states that he pulled from Democrats are plummeting and, as he claws for his political life, he seems to be dragging down his party with him.

Republicans are trailing in governorships they’ve held since 2011 in Wisconsin, Michigan and Ohio. And a recent NBC News/Marist Poll found that 63 percent of Wisconsin voters and 62 percent in Michigan say Trump doesn’t deserve another term. His approval rating is below his national average at 36 percent in both states. In two June polls of Ohio, voters disapproved of Trump by double-digit margins.

Much has been made of Trump’s continued popularity with white voters, in particular white voters without a college education. But income tells a much clearer story about what’s going on with his crumbling numbers in the Midwest. In Wisconsin, he is at 41 percent approval among voters earning at least $50,000 a year and only 28 percent with those earning less. In Michigan, 32 percent of those making under $50,000 approve, compared with 37 percent earning at least $50,000.

Political scientist Josh Pacewicz argued that Trump’s popularity in the Rust Belt was the result of “undirected populist resentment at a technocratic, corporate-friendly elite.” The “corporate-friendly elite” might as well be the name of the Trump administration’s softball team.

Trump’s policies have been precisely tailored to pleasure the richest. Under his tax law, businesses received nine times more in cuts than what they gave their workers and spent 37 times more on stock buybacks than on bonuses since the reforms became law, according to Americans for Tax Fairness. Trump’s Treasury secretary now suggests that the administration may serve up $100 billion more in tax cuts that will go to the richest of the richest, who just happen to include much of Trump’s Cabinet, family and donors.

Predatory lenders and corporate criminals are getting lush new protections while the Great Lakes are under attack. And if there is an economic boom going on, it’s flowing mostly to the sort of Americans who can pay a $200,000 initiation fee at Mar-a-lago.

An Associated Press analysis finds that 58.5 percent of the job gains from May of 2017 until this May were in counties that backed 2016 popular vote-winner Hillary Clinton. These are mostly the areas of the country that were doing pretty well under President Barack Obama.

If you were a voter willing to tolerate Trump’s race baiting in order to get some actual relief for your community or to punish “the elites,” then putting kids in cages, cracking down on legal immigrants and deporting veterans’ wives is a poor substitute. In exchange for their votes for gold-plated populism, Midwesterners got a plutocrat in need of platinum pacifier. If Trump is going to fool them again, he’ll need a new act — or an old one with a super strong dose of what he knows best: scaring white people.