USA TODAY International Edition
Short-handed Supreme Court goes to the frogs
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court began its 2018 term Monday short-handed while the White House and Senate tangle over sexual abuse allegations pending against Brett Kavanaugh. Within minutes, the difficulty of having just eight justices was apparent. The court’s first case focused on an endangered frog – not the sort of issue that usually divides the justices along ideological lines. But that appeared to be the case as the more liberal justices sided with the government – and the frog – while the conservatives aligned with a corporation whose land is at stake. That raised the specter of a potential 4-4 split, exactly what the court seeks to avoid when it’s short one justice. After Associate Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in 2016, the court had only eight justices for 14 months and deadlocked five times, including on major immigration and workers’ rights cases. The court’s docket for the new term does not include major cases on divisive issues, such as abortion or voting rights. That’s the way the justices like it when they risk deadlocking on cases, which merely leaves lower court decisions intact. But bigger cases are in the pipeline and cannot be headed off indefinitely. Issues on their way include partisan gerrymandering, LGBT employment rights and deportation protection for undocumented immigrants brought to the USA as children. Facing a rather dry caseload for the next few months, the court opened with a case that was at least entertaining, something it has done in recent years. Other opening day cases focused on a floating home, a busted taillight and a train accident in Austria. The plight of the dusky gopher frog wouldn’t seem to rise to that level. Nearly extinct in Mississippi because breeding requires ephemeral ponds that alternate between wet and dry, the tiny frogs may be destined for Louisiana if the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has its way. A Louisiana timber company challenged the designation of more than 1,500 acres of forested land in St. Tammany Parish as “critical habitat” for the frog. There are no dusky gopher frogs there now, and the designation could reduce the land’s value by up to $33 million if it cannot be developed, according to Timothy Bishop, the lawyer for Weyerhaeuser Co. When the frog was listed as endangered in 2001, its population had been reduced to approximately 100 adult frogs in a single pond in Mississippi. The government designated four Mississippi counties as potential habitat, later adding the disputed parcel in Louisiana, where the frogs existed until 1965. Associate Justice Elena Kagan said the Endangered Species Act could not have preferred extinction to development of the new habitat, even if modifications are required.