USA TODAY International Edition

Instagram ‘influencers’ follow the money

- Cara Kelly

The Instagram influencer as a species is easy to spot. Defined by large social media followings, these marketers produce content awash with the trappings of young money: designer outfits modeled in exotic locations; marble countertop­s under flat-lays of beauty products. It’s enough to make the most overstimul­ated social media user pause and wonder, “How much are they making off this, exactly?” The answer, if they play the game correctly, is a lot. A wealth of jaw-dropping figures emerged in 2018, from makeup vlogger Jeffree Starr’s reported $18 million in yearly earnings, to fashion blogger Chiara Ferragni’s wedding, hashtagged #TheFerragn­ez, which garnered $36 million in Media Impact Value for her partner brands.

“You can’t toss a rock in New York City without interrupti­ng an Instagram shoot,” says Brittany Hennessy, author of “Influencer: Building Your Personal Brand in the Age of Social Media” and former director of Influencer Strategy and Talent Partnershi­ps at Hearst Magazines Digital Media.

“There’s lots of money at play. These girls make so much money. There are families of four who make $20,000, and girls can clear that in two campaigns.”

Why? Technology and consumeris­m have changed. Ad blockers eat away at traditiona­l digital marketing, such as banner ads and video prerolls. Television ads don’t reach Millennial­s and Gen Zers who long ago cut the cable cord. Phones, influencers’ native habitats, are everything.

Brand spending on influencer marketing is expected to hit $101 billion by 2020, up from $81 billion in 2016, according to the Associatio­n of National Advertiser­s and PQ Media. Of brands surveyed, 75 percent say they’re using influencers, and 43 percent of that group plan to increase their budgets in the next year.

The result is a gold rush in the form of street-style pics and #mirrorself­ies.

Influencers and companies are tight-lipped about the ins and outs of contracts. Most standardiz­ed rates, USA TODAY found, start with follower counts.

An industry rule of thumb, verified by USA TODAY through interviews with nearly a dozen influencers, marketing profession­als and influencer platform founders, is a baseline rate of around 1 percent of follower counts per sponsored Instagram post, or $100 for every 10,000 followers.

That means someone with 100,000 followers might start around $1,000 per sponsored post, while an influencer with 1 million followers could charge roughly $10,000.

“If you only do one a month you’re making $100,000 a year. That’s a lot more than most of these girls were making at their full-time job,” Hennessy says.

Lindsay Silberman, who has 140,000 Instagram followers, left her job as an editor at Town and Country magazine to create her own luxury lifestyle content. The tide turned around the 100,000-followers mark, she says.

“I was getting offers from brands more and more often,” she says. “I got to the point where it would have been fiscally irresponsi­ble not to pursue it.”

Hennessy says rates are determined by factors beyond follower count, including quality of content, audience demographi­c, name recognitio­n and engagement.

Every time you add yourself to an influencer’s million existing followers, you’ve given that #blessed creator about $1 per campaign in future earnings. Add another if you frequently double-tap or comment about wanting to try that drink or lipstick.

As companies become more wary of bots and fake followers, engagement (likes, comments, clicks or shares) has emerged as a desired measure. CPEs (cost per engagement) are now another way to calculate rates.

The shift in priorities from reach to engagement has created opportunit­ies for micro-influencers.

Influencers like Angela Davis, who started the food blog Kitchenist­a Diaries in 2012 and has 58,000 followers on Instagram, tend to have a more intimate connection with their audience. Davis’ 80,000 Twitter followers respond to her by the hundreds with the hashtag #kitchenist­asundays, inspired by her Sunday night dinners.

“It’s more than I can keep up with,” Davis says. “Dinner parties, public ticketed events, that all spun off from that one hashtag.”

Five years after dedicating herself to food blogging, her self-published cookbooks account for a majority of her income and she’s hearing more from marketing agencies. In December, Royal Caribbean paid for her to go on a cruise to highlight its dining.

Most influencers are one-man bands, juggling content creation with traditiona­l office work like reviewing contracts, communicat­ing with brands, managing invoices and tracking data. Many say they work longer hours than at the jobs they had before. Competitio­n is fierce.

“A lot of content is uploaded to YouTube every day. Getting through the noise is really hard,” says Lisa Filipelli, a partner at Select Management who manages vlogger Amanda Steele, who started at age 11 and now is followed by 2.7 million people.

“When I started out there were only two people with millions of subscriber­s. Now it’s thousands.”

 ??  ??
 ?? USA TODAY ??
USA TODAY
 ??  ?? Brittany Hennessy
Brittany Hennessy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States