USA TODAY International Edition

Sandbaggin­g just not USA style

- Nancy Armour Columnist USA TODAY

DEAUVILLE, France – A loss at the World Cup isn’t always what it seems.

The Americans are already through to the next round, lessening some of the importance of Thursday’s final Group F game against Sweden. Yes, there’s still top of the group to be determined, to say nothing of that not-so-insignificant grudge they’ve been carrying around for almost three years now after Sweden handed them their earliest exit from a major internatio­nal tournament.

But truth be told, the U.S. might be better off sandbaggin­g it against Sweden.

A loss now might improve their chances of winning the tournament.

“We want to win every game,” U.S. coach Jill Ellis said. “That’s where we’re at, and that’s what we want to do.”

Ellis’ response hardly comes as a surprise. One of the U.S. women’s best attributes has always been their determinat­ion, and they have shown so far this tournament that they have no interest in dialing it back or toning it down. But is it the best play?

Which road to take is more than an existentia­l question in the World Cup. Where you finish in the group determines your path through the knockout rounds, and sometimes the draw does the winners no favors.

The winners of Groups A and D in this World Cup are on the same side of the draw as the Group F winner. That means, should the U.S. finish atop Group F, it faces the prospect of having to play France (quarterfinals) and England (semifinals) just to get to the final.

France is ranked No. 4 in the world but has been arguably the strongest team in the tournament after the Americans, and it also can count on a sizable home-crowd advantage. England, ranked No. 3, finished third four years ago.

Should the Americans lose to Sweden, however, it would likely mean playing Germany in the quarterfinals. Yes, Germany is ranked No. 2 in the world, a two-time World Cup winner and the reigning Olympic champion.

But it has looked vulnerable, by far the weakest of the top teams.

“You can’t overthink this,” Ellis insisted. “Deciding to come second or manipulate a score, I just think that can be dangerous.”

It might not end up mattering, anyway.

There was no shortage of angst when Belgium and England faced off in the men’s World Cup last summer with the top spot in their group on the line, the fear being the winner was putting itself on a collision course with either Brazil or Mexico in the quarterfinals.

“We want to perform well but the priority is not to win,” Belgium manager Roberto Martinez acknowledg­ed before the game.

Belgium beat England to win the group and, sure enough, got Brazil in the quarterfinals. But the Red Devils beat Brazil, ensuring they would either match or better their previous best finish, fourth, in a World Cup.

Belgium lost to eventual winner France in the semifinals while England lost to Croatia. The Red Devils then beat England, again, in the third-place game.

And in the 2011 Women’s World Cup, the United States finished second to Sweden in group play, which meant playing Brazil rather than Australia in the quarterfinals. The Americans won — in epic fashion, no less — and would go on to reach the finals.

“Whether you play team X in group play, whether you play in the semis or finals or quarters or 16s, you’ve got to play everybody — and you’ve got to be prepared to play everybody to win this thing,” Ellis said.

“I don’t think there’s a plotting out a dream path or something like that. The draw is what it is, and we navigate whoever’s in front of us.”

Besides, unlike most of the rest of us, who would need little encouragem­ent to take it easy at work, telling the Americans to play to lose would likely spark a rebellion.

After that 13-0 rout of Thailand in the opener, Ellis made seven changes to her starting lineup for Sunday’s game against Chile. The Americans still won 3-0, and would have scored six or seven more had Chilean goalkeeper Christiane Endler not been downright spectacula­r, a performanc­e that will be hard for any goalkeeper to top the rest of the tournament.

She stopped 14 shots just in the second half, repeatedly stymieing Christen Press and making a kick save on a point-blank shot from Lindsey Horan.

So to ask the Americans to not go full throttle against Sweden, yeah, that probably won’t happen.

“I struggle to tell my team not to tackle each other in training the day before” a game, Ellis said.

The U.S. women have been called a lot of things already at this World Cup. Slackers won’t be one of them.

 ??  ?? “We want to win every game,” U.S. coach Jill Ellis says. “That’s where we’re at, and that’s what we want to do.” MICHAEL CHOW/USA TODAY SPORTS
“We want to win every game,” U.S. coach Jill Ellis says. “That’s where we’re at, and that’s what we want to do.” MICHAEL CHOW/USA TODAY SPORTS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States