USA TODAY International Edition

Giuliani got feds’ attention in early ’ 19

Investigat­ors sought info on his ties to recently arrested GOP donors

- Kevin McCoy and Kevin Johnson

NEW YORK – U. S. counterint­elligence agents have been examining Rudy Giuliani’s business dealings with two men indicted last week on campaign finance charges since at least early 2019, according to a Manhattan lawyer.

Kenneth McCallion, who has represente­d several Ukrainian clients including former Ukraine Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko in U. S. court cases, said the agents contacted him in February or March. They asked whether Giuliani, who is President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, had business dealings with Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman.

The Ukrainian- born Parnas and Fruman of Belarus are accused of conspiring to circumvent federal campaign financing laws by funneling foreign money to U. S. political candidates and committees in a scheme to buy influence.

The two men, who now live in Florida, played instrument­al roles in connecting Giuliani with Ukrainian officials as Giuliani sought informatio­n about the financial dealings there of Hunter Biden, the son of former U. S. Vice President Joe Biden – one of Trump’s 2020 presidenti­al campaign challenger­s.

Parnas and Fruman were arrested last week as they tried to board a flight out of the country. They’re in federal custody on $ 1 million bonds and have not yet entered pleas to the charges. They are scheduled to appear in a New York City federal court Thursday.

McCallion said he “was asked a lot of questions by FBI and other counterint­elligence investigat­ors who were looking at Giuliani’s comings and goings in Ukraine and business dealings.”

“They were interested in the nature of any business dealings with them,” McCallion said, referring to Parnas and Fruman. He said he has not been involved in any business or legal matters with Giuliani.

Manhattan lawyer Kenneth McCallion says he “was asked a lot of questions by FBI and other counterint­elligence investigat­ors who were looking at Giuliani’s comings and goings in Ukraine and business dealings.”

Giuliani said Tuesday he had “no such knowledge” of a federal inquiry involving him.

Asked whether he was aware that agents had questioned the New York attorney about his dealings with Parnas and Fruman, Giuliani said, “No.”

A person familiar with the matter said federal authoritie­s have been examining Giuliani’s activities as part of the investigat­ion involving Parnas and Fruman.

The person, who is not authorized to comment publicly, did not know whether that inquiry ranged beyond Giuliani’s associatio­n with the two men.

Late last week, The New York Times reported that federal prosecutor­s are investigat­ing Giuliani for potential lobbying law violations as it relates to his work in Ukraine. The Times reported that the probe focuses on Giuliani’s efforts to “undermine” former U. S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie L. Yovanovitc­h, who testified before three House committees Friday as part of the House impeachmen­t inquiry of Trump.

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that investigat­ors have been examining Giuliani’s finances, including bank records related to his work in Ukraine, since at least August.

Tuesday afternoon, Giuliani’s lawyer informed House Democrats that he wouldn’t comply with a subpoena to produce documents related to his dealings on behalf of Trump in Ukraine.

The committees demanded documents from Giuliani dealing with “the extent to which President Trump jeopardize­d national security by pressing Ukraine to interfere with our 2020 election and by withholdin­g security assistance provided by Congress to help Ukraine counter Russian aggression.”

Giuliani has done business in Ukraine since at least 2008. In June 2017, he delivered a speech called “Global Challenge, the Role of the U. S. and the Place of Ukraine,” according to a post on the website of the Pinchuk Foundation.

Victor Pinchuk, a billionair­e and the son of a former Ukrainian president, moderated the event and invited future Ukrainian leaders “to shape the proper messages that Mr. Giuliani would bring” to the U. S., the foundation said on its website.

Giuliani met with Ukraine government officials, including then- President Petro Poroshenko and Yuriy Lutsenko, the then- prosecutor general, the post said.

Giuliani subsequent­ly met with Lutsenko in January 2019 in New York and a month later in Warsaw, Poland, according to a whistleblo­wer complaint that has triggered a House impeachmen­t inquiry proceeding against Trump.

In a series of reports published in The Hill in March and April, Lutsenko and other Ukrainian officials made claims about purported Ukrainian involvemen­t in the 2016 presidenti­al election and former Vice President Biden’s purported efforts to protect Ukraine business interests of his son, Hunter. Neither allegation has been substantia­ted.

Lutsenko also claimed that Marie Yovanovitc­h, the former U. S. ambassador to Ukraine, gave him a do- not- prosecute list of subjects in Ukraine. Lutsenko has since recanted that allegation, too, and several Ukrainian officials have told USA TODAY he’s not credible. He has not responded to requests for comment.

Parnas and Fruman, according to Ukrainian media reports, helped arrange Lutsenko’s New York meeting with Giuliani.

The pair’s sizable campaign contributi­ons in the U. S. have attracted the scrutiny of federal election authoritie­s. Their company, Global Energy Producers, was credited with giving $ 325,000 to a pro- Trump political action committee in May 2018.

That same month, Parnas posted photos on Facebook of him and Fruman with President Trump in the White House and with Donald Trump Jr. in California.

Although Global Energy Partners was identified as the source of the contributi­on to America First Action SuperPAC, financial records show that the money came via a circuitous route through another company linked to Fruman, according to a federal indictment.

Prosecutor­s allege that Parnas and Fruman gave $ 5,400 to a U. S. congressma­n and pledged to raise another $ 20,000 as they sought his help in removing Yovanovitc­h as U. S. ambassador to Ukraine.

In May, Trump abruptly pulled Yovanovitc­h from her assignment. Giuliani has said he argued for her removal because she was critical of the president.

Ukrainian media say Parnas and Fruman helped arrange Lutsenko’s New York meeting with Giuliani.

 ??  ?? Fruman
Fruman
 ??  ?? Parnas
Parnas

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States