USA TODAY International Edition

Our view: Who should blame WHO? Not Donald Trump.

-

Donald Trump’s election- year desperatio­n to deflect criticism about his slow response to a pandemic that has killed nearly 30,000 Americans reached a stark level of cruelty this week with his decision to withhold funding from the World Health Organizati­on in the midst of an internatio­nal health crisis.

If Trump’s failure in January, February and early March to adequately prepare the nation for COVID- 19 proves to have cost American lives, his reckless choice Wednesday to deny WHO an estimated 22% of its budget as the organizati­on tries to help the poorest nations cope with the coronaviru­s pandemic could multiply that failure.

Let’s be clear. There are legitimate questions about whether the United Nations’ health group was too trusting of Chinese assurances in late December and early January that there was no human- to- human transmissi­on of the new virus, even while Beijing secretly knew hundreds were being hospitaliz­ed as the disease rapidly spread.

Nor was WHO quick to declare a global health crisis as other nations fell victim. And the organizati­on stubbornly clung to its historical view that travel bans are ineffective at stopping disease and create needless panic and economic damage, though Trump’s limited travel restrictio­ns on visitors from China on Feb. 2 clearly bought America time to formulate a response.

But it wasn’t as if the World Health Organizati­on did nothing. It pressed Beijing, without success at first, to allow a WHO team into the country to investigat­e. And through urgent advisories and regular news briefings, it warned of a brewing crisis.

Certainly more damning is the growing evidence of a cover- up by top Chinese officials who, according to an Associated Press investigat­ion this week, knew they had a potential pandemic underway by Jan. 14, yet waited six days — until after the first overseas case surfaced in Thailand — before telling the world.

Yet when Trump unleashed his torrent of blame this week, it wasn’t against Beijing and President Xi Jinping — with whom the U. S. president has had a strangely deferentia­l relationsh­ip — but against WHO.

And if wasn’t bad enough that Trump’s attacks this week were a transparen­t effort to deflect attention from his own failures, much of what he said the U. N. health group did wrong — “The outbreak could have been contained” — mirrors the president’s own actions during that same time period.

The National Security Council had intelligen­ce by early January of a China outbreak that could threaten the United States, and by the end of the month, Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro was warning of a pandemic that could kill up to half a million in the USA.

Yet for weeks, Trump dismissed concerns about the pandemic threat and didn’t urge social distancing until the middle of March.

Moreover, on Jan. 24, Trump tweeted praise for China’s handling of the epidemic, including the nation’s “transparen­cy,” adding, “It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!”

Trump is now seeking an investigat­ion of WHO’s actions toward China, something Republican lawmakers have already wanted, and that might be a good idea.

In the meantime, it’s wrong to withhold half- a- billion dollars in financial support for an organizati­on that’s a key ally in the war against the coronaviru­s.

WHO’s “work is slowing the spread of COVID- 19, and if that work is stopped, no other organizati­on can replace them,” philanthro­pist billionair­e Bill Gates tweeted Wednesday.

Cutting support for WHO in the middle of a pandemic is, as Gates said, “as dangerous as it sounds.”

 ?? SAMUEL HABTAB/ AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? A WHO worker checks health supplies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on Tuesday.
SAMUEL HABTAB/ AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES A WHO worker checks health supplies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States