USA TODAY International Edition

WHO says coronaviru­s came from an animal

- Kim Hjelmgaard

The available evidence indicates coronaviru­s originated in animals in China late last year and was not manipulate­d or produced in a laboratory as has been alleged, the World Health Organizati­on said Tuesday in a news briefing in Geneva.

“It is probable, likely, that the virus is of animal origin,” WHO spokeswoma­n Fadela Chaib said.

The global health body’s remarks follow confirmation from President Donald Trump last week that his administra­tion is investigat­ing whether coronaviru­s originated in a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the disease emerged.

Speculatio­n about how coronaviru­s may have escaped the Wuhan Institute of Virology has circulated among right- wing bloggers and conservati­ve media pundits.

One suggestion that the virus could be man- made and linked to a Chinese biowarfare program has been widely dismissed by scientists.

Under a second scenario, the virus was naturally occurring – from a bat, say – but accidental­ly escaped the research facility because of poor safety protocols.

Both notions are based on circumstan­tial evidence such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s history of studying coronaviru­ses in bats, the lab’s proximity to where some of the infections were first diagnosed and China’s lax safety record in its labs.

Chaib said there remain questions over how precisely coronaviru­s jumped the species barrier to humans, but an intermedia­te animal host is the most likely explanatio­n.

She said the coronaviru­s, which causes the disease COVID- 19, “most probably has its ecological reservoir in bats.”

The Trump administra­tion accused the WHO of a catalog of errors over its response to the pandemic, including failing to adequately prepare for the outbreak, raising the alarm too slowly and naively accepting flawed informatio­n from China.

The WHO disputed all the allegation­s. Most public health experts don’t agree with the Trump administra­tion’s specific criticisms of the WHO, although they acknowledg­e that the organizati­on needs reform and lacks transparen­cy.

The Washington Post reported over the weekend that American officials working with the WHO sent back informatio­n to the White House about the spread of the virus in the crucial early days of January.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States