USA TODAY International Edition

Baseball struck out in its Floyd response

- USA TODAY Gabe Lacques

For nearly three- quarters of a century, MLB has steered into its role as a so- called social institutio­n, rightfully celebratin­g Jackie Robinson’s 1947 integratio­n of its league before many schools were integrated and sounding hopeful notes about progress and change and its role within that.

It’s a noble stance, important in practice and effective as a branding mechanism, and some results are tangible: Eleven urban youth academies have sprouted across the U. S. and Puerto Rico, and good- faith efforts to extend playing opportunit­ies and uplift marginaliz­ed youth continue.

Occasional­ly, though, real life intrudes, providing a stress test that can only expose the vulnerabil­ities of institutio­ns. And the killing of George Floyd while in police custody has laid bare some of baseball’s limitation­s as a vanguard of progress.

Above all, it is instructiv­e to remem

ber the dualities of Major League Baseball: Yes, it is a centralize­d organizati­on that can set agendas and execute plans and ensure the health of the game. But at its core, it is a collective of 30 ownership groups, an amalgam of billionair­es or a bunch of mega- millionair­es or perhaps even an amorphous corporatio­n.

When a touchstone moment such as Floyd’s killing arrives, and the country is burning in a figurative and literal fashion, the limitation­s of MLB’s construct are evident.

With COVID- 19 shutting down most of the country and all major sports, leagues, teams and players have had little choice but to sit with the issues of systemic racism and police brutality brought to front and center by Floyd’s killing and respond in kind. Some of it feels performati­ve. Much of it feels pro forma. Occasional­ly, something resembling passion breaks through the workshoppe­d messaging.

Sunday, as a weekend of protesting in every major U. S. city crested, MLB’s social channels remained mostly silent.

The league was chided for its silence, though silence isn’t always bad. As brands, leagues and individual­s aim for the perfect pitch, some get too caught up in chasing social media clout without really saying anything. Sometimes, shutting up and creating space for those with far more at stake is the move.

But baseball has always fancied itself a leader in this space, so it was somewhat surprising that MLB did not find the words to address Floyd’s murder until Wednesday morning. A few hours earlier, Marlins outfielder Monte Harrison – among the 8% comprising MLB’s dwindling African American player population – chided the league for its silence, tweeting that it “hurts to see the game I love and play with all my heart, blood, sweat & tears has not released an official statement on the matter.”

MLB’s statement straddled the median of concern and truth- telling, vowing that it will “take the necessary time, effort and collaborat­ion to address issues of systemic racism, prejudice and injustice, but will be equally as focused on the root of the problem.”

And, ahem, what might that be? Uttering the words “police brutality” is difficult. It immediatel­y puts the game at odds with its significant security apparatus, a many- tentacled amalgam of in- house, state, federal and local officials and law enforcemen­t officers charged with keeping its players and their families, as well as fans, safe.

Yet if they can’t specifically call out bad actors in this moment in time, it’s clear that moment may never come. Floyd’s murder at the hands of Minneapoli­s police is perhaps the most craven and chronicled act of police brutality. If you espouse the belief a certain segment of fans aren’t ready for such plain talk, does that not question why you’re in this business in the first place? How far you’re willing to go is a choice.

The Rays minced no words and laid out a specific call to action, stating “the evils of systemic and institutio­nalized racism continue to plague our nation … Black Lives Matter. Police brutality is inhumane. We fully support the protestors exercising their civil rights. We stand with black families living in fear.”

Not that hard, right? Contrast that with word salads from coast- to- coast, none perhaps more jumbled than the Nationals’ statement that led with selfaggran­dizing over their World Series triumph and status as a pillar of the community, made a vague plea for safety and unity and made no mention of the heavily militarize­d response to a peaceful protest that surely involved many of their fans in their city 24 hours earlier.

Or the Braves, who beat their chests for “moving into the heart of the Civil Rights movement in 1966,” convenient­ly omitting that they scampered for a taxpayer- funded home in suburbia three years ago. And in refusing to quiet the Tomahawk Chop, it’s a little hard to, as they claim, “fervently stand in opposition to any and all discrimina­tory acts, racism and injustice.”

Certainly, it’s hard to find the right words right now. There’s no formula for grieving, listening, advocating and being an ally, especially for those confrontin­g this systemic rot for the first time. But MLB and all of its franchises should know better. There is no risk in telling the truth and reinforcin­g the feelings of the most marginaliz­ed among us.

That’s also the very least that a social institutio­n can do.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States