USA TODAY International Edition

Senate report on Russia calls Manafort ‘ grave’ threat

- Kristine Phillips and Kevin Johnson

WASHINGTON – Paul Manafort’s role as chairman of the Trump campaign, his longstandi­ng ties to people affiliated with Russian intelligen­ce services and his willingnes­s to share informatio­n with them “represente­d a grave counterint­elligence threat” during the 2016 presidenti­al race, according to a new report from the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee.

“The Committee found that Manafort’s presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunit­ies for Russian intelligen­ce services to

exert influence over, and acquire confidential informatio­n on, the Trump campaign,” according to the nearly 1,000- page report released Tuesday.

The wide- ranging, bipartisan report gives a comprehens­ive account of contacts between Russian actors and Trump associates, including Manafort and Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son. It confirms the findings by former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion that Russia sought to sway the 2016 race in Trump’s favor and that members of the president’s campaign were eager beneficiaries of the effort, although there was no evidence of a conspiracy with the Kremlin.

Manafort was released to home confinement in May because of the risk posed by the spread of the coronaviru­s in federal prison after being sentenced to more than seven years. His attorneys didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The heavily redacted report, released just three months before the presidenti­al election, is the final installmen­t from the Republican- led committee’s three- year probe into Russian election meddling.

“We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then- candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election,” said Sen. Marco Rubio, R- Fla., the committee’s acting chairman. “What the Committee did find, however, is very troubling. We found irrefutabl­e evidence of Russian meddling.”

The Trump campaign cast the Senate panel’s findings as yet more proof that there was no conspiracy with Russia. “The Russia Collusion Hoax is the greatest political scandal in the history of this country,” Tim Murtaugh, Trump 2020 communicat­ions director, said in a statement.

Sen. Richard Burr, R- N. C., the committee’s former chair who oversaw much of the investigat­ion, struck a more neutral tone.

“One of the Committee’s most important – and overlooked – findings is that much of Russia’s activities weren’t related to producing a specific electoral outcome, but attempted to undermine our faith in the democratic process itself. Their aim is to sow chaos, discord, and distrust. Their efforts are not limited to elections. The threat is ongoing,” Burr said.

Democrats, meanwhile, highlighte­d findings about Trump campaign officials’ contacts with Russian actors.

The committee’s vice chairman, Sen. Mark Warner, D- Va., said the “breathtaki­ng level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives” is a “very real counterint­elligence threat to our elections.”

“This is what collusion looks like,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D- Calif., chair of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, echoing Senate Democrats.

The report delves deeply into Manafort’s ties with Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime business associate with whom Manafort worked as part of his lobbying efforts in Ukraine and Russia.

While Mueller’s investigat­ors described Kilimnik as someone with ties to Russian intelligen­ce, the committee called him “a Russian intelligen­ce officer” with whom Manafort “sought to secretly share” sensitive internal polling data from the Trump campaign. The committee, however, was unable to determine why Manafort did so or with whom Kilimnik shared the informatio­n.

During and after the 2016 campaign, Manafort and Kilimnik spoke and met multiple times. The two talked about strategies to defeat Democratic presidenti­al candidate Hillary Clinton, according to the report, citing a conversati­on Kilimnik had with an associate in which he said Manafort had a “clever plan of screwing Clinton.” The two also talked about how Trump might win, the report said, noting that Manafort expected Kilimnik to share the informatio­n to people in Ukraine and elsewhere.

The report said Kilimnik sought to leverage his relationsh­ip with Manafort and use him to influence the Trump administra­tion and Moscow “to effect a certain political outcome.”

The committee also said Kilimnik may have been tied to the Russian intelligen­ce “hack and leak” operations during the 2016 campaign. The committee said it obtained informatio­n suggesting that Kilimnik may have been the channel for Russian intelligen­ce officials to coordinate the hacking operation, although it acknowledg­ed its evidence is limited.

Manafort is one of half a dozen former Trump aides and associates who were indicted as a result of the Mueller investigat­ion. The Senate panel’s findings on Manafort and Kilimnik mirrored some of those in Mueller’s report.

Manafort had told Mueller’s investigat­ors that he did not believe his longtime associate was also working as a Russian spy. Mueller’s team noted that Manafort’s partner, Rick Gates, had suspected Kilimnik was a “spy” and shared that assessment with Manafort.

In one of two meetings with Kilimnik during his tenure as Trump campaign chairman, “Manafort briefed Kilimnik on the state of the Trump Campaign and Manafort’s plan to win the election,” the Mueller report concluded. “That briefing encompasse­d the campaign’s messaging and its internal polling data. According to Gates, it also included discussion of ‘ battlegrou­nd’ states, which Manafort identified as Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvan­ia, and Minnesota.”

Early last year, a federal judge found that Manafort had lied repeatedly to federal prosecutor­s about his contacts with Kilimnik, ultimately upending a plea deal Manafort had struck with Mueller’s team. Among the contested exchanges, prosecutor­s asserted that Manafort lied about having provided polling data to Kilimnik.

In 2018, Manafort and Kilimnik were charged together with trying to obstruct Mueller’s inquiry by seeking to block the testimony of at least two witnesses.

The case prompted a judge to revoke Manafort’s bail and order him to jail to await separate trials on a slew of financial fraud charges in Alexandria, Virginia, and Washington, D. C., where he was ultimately convicted.

The report also provides an unflattering look at the FBI, which the committee said gave “unjustified credence” on the findings of a former British intelligen­ce officer, or the so- called Steele dossier, as it sought court approvals to wiretap former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Republican­s seized on this finding to criticize the FBI’s investigat­ion of the Trump campaign during the early days of the Russia investigat­ion.

“We discovered deeply troubling actions taken by the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion, particular­ly their acceptance and willingnes­s to rely on the ‘ Steele Dossier’ without verifying its methodolog­y or sourcing,” Rubio said.

 ??  ?? Manafort
Manafort

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States