USA TODAY International Edition

Release of grand jury recordings delayed

- Darcy Costello, Tessa Duvall and Matt Mencarini

A judge has agreed to the request from the Kentucky attorney general to push back the release of records in the case.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. – A judge agreed to state Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s request for a delay in releasing grand jury recordings in the controvers­ial Breonna Taylor case, initially due by noon Wednesday.

Cameron asked for a one- week extension in a motion filed Tuesday, saying the delay was necessary to protect witnesses’ personal informatio­n. The high- profile case has prompted threats against officials and police officers.

Judge Ann Bailey Smith gave his office a new deadline of noon Friday to submit the recordings.

Stew Mathews, who represents former detective Brett Hankison, confirmed the deadline to The Louisville Courier Journal.

Elizabeth Kuhn, a spokeswoma­n for Cameron, confirmed that Smith “granted an extension ... to give us proper time to redact specific personal informatio­n of witnesses.”

Cameron’s office wants to “redact personal identifiers of any named person, and to redact both names and personal identifiers of any private citizen.”

Kuhn said Wednesday morning that the audio recording is 20 hours long and that the office filed a motion to request additional time “to redact personally identifiable informatio­n of witnesses, including addresses and phone numbers.”

In response to myriad threats, the Louisville Metro Police Department is “providing extraordin­ary protection,” including up to 400 hours of security each week to protect officers, public officials and their families, according to a motion filed by F. Scott Lewis, attorney for the grand jury witnesses.

Smithorder­ed Cameron on Monday to include the grand jury recording as evidence in the criminal case against Hankison.

Wednesday, 13 witnesses interviewe­d by the LMPD Public Integrity Unit and the Attorney General’s Office filed a separate motion seeking a limited protective order that would prevent anything included in the public case file from including their names or other identifyin­g informatio­n.

The motion cited the “thousands, if not millions” of people interested in the case and potential for “threats to and reprisals against witnesses.”

Cameron said Monday that he would comply with Smith’s order, but he was concerned it could compromise a federal investigat­ion and have unintended consequenc­es of tainting the jury pool.

Sam Aguiar, a Louisville attorney who has represente­d Taylor’s family, said Wednesday the move was “par for the course for Daniel Cameron to blatantly mislead the public.”

Monday, a grand juror in the case filed a court motion calling for the release of the recording and transcript, along with permission to speak freely about what charges and defendants were not considered.

One week ago, the grand jury indicted Hankison on three counts of wanton endangerme­nt but did not bring charges against any of the officers for Taylor’s death.

Hankison’s charges stemmed from shots he fired into a neighborin­g apartment with three residents.

Cameron’s investigat­ion has sprung leaks and faced intense scrutiny from the public and attorneys for Taylor’s family. Louisville- based attorney Lonita Baker called for a new special prosecutor to be appointed.

The Attorney General’s office asked for time “to redact personally identifiable informatio­n of witnesses, including addresses and phone numbers.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States