USA TODAY International Edition

Race and royals don’t mix at Buckingham

Palace wasn’t ready for Meghan and Archie

- Sophia A. Nelson Sophia A. Nelson is an adjunct professor at Christophe­r Newport University in Virginia and the author of “E Pluribus ONE: Reclaiming Our Founders’ Vision for a United America.”

I am of mixed race. Both my maternal and paternal grandmothe­rs have a white father or a white grandfathe­r who married their Black mothers. My two nieces ( ages 18 and 23) are of mixed race. Their mother is white. They look a bit like Meghan Markle. Fair skinned, dark long beautiful straight hair, freckles, more white features, but still identifiably Black.

One of the clearest and frankly most heartbreak­ing takeaways from the jawdroppin­g Oprah interview with Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, on Sunday via a CBS special was when Meghan talked about her unborn son, and that an unnamed member or members of the “royal family” had raised questions about young Archie’s possible “skin color” and how “dark” he might be. Full stop.

This is 2021. How ignorant can anyone not know that mixed- race children who are ( as in the case of Archie 3/ 4ths white) will very likely look white. Or as we say in the Black community, they can “pass” for white.

Meghan told Oprah Winfrey that she and Harry did not choose to forgo a title for baby Archie, the first mixed- race royal since Queen Charlotte sat on the throne in the 1800s. She said she was told that the rules prevented it, at least until his grandfathe­r, Prince Charles, ascended the throne. But she shocked Winfrey when she said they were told that the baby could not get royal security without a title.

My ancestors

In this new brave world of “mixed race” children — of which according to a 2017 Pew Research Study, 1 in 7 U. S. infants ( 14%) born in 2015 were multiracia­l or multiethni­c ( nearly triple the share in 1980) — we still have a long way to go. My nieces consider themselves Black — just as did my paternal grandmothe­r consider herself Black ( even though she was a mulatto).

My maternal great- great- grandmothe­r “Viney” was a slave girl, who ran off with my white great- great- great grandpa Henry ( a slave owner’s son from Georgia). They fell in love. They could not get married due to the miscegenat­ion laws of the post- Civil War in the mid- 1860s. They fled to Oklahoma then to California, where they married and had 11 kids. Their kids were considered “negro” or “colored.”

It all goes back to the infamous “one drop rule”: a uniquely American phrase coined to identify slave children often fathered by white men on the plantation­s that owned them. It was a slick practice that deprived mulatto slave children of any legal rights to property that their white fathers might have had. Those rights and privileges were passed only to legitimate white kids.

In a powerful PBS “Frontline” piece about the one drop rule, author F. James Davis writes: “Not only does the one- drop rule apply to no other group than American blacks, but apparently the rule is unique in that it is found only in the United States.”

We are not unlike many Black families in America who have white blood in our immediate family lines. And like many more American families who have mixed race ancestry and either do not know it or do not speak about it. That includes our white brothers and sisters who have great- great- grandparen­ts or further back who were once slaves and who once free could pass for white and blended in.

America clearly is still struggling with race. Just take a look at voter suppressio­n laws being enacted in the South, and our national dialogue around race, policing, diversity and equity. But the British royal family seems stuck in the dark ages relative to race.

1/ 4 Black Archie

In America, we have been forced to confront our racial issues head on since the Civil War, throughout the Jim Crow era and during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. It was just in my lifetime, the year I was born in 1967, that my home state of Virginia legalized marriage between the races in the landmark Supreme Court Case of Loving vs. Virginia. That was only 54 years ago.

In the final analysis, clearly race and royalty do not mix in the minds of many in the British media, the British upper classes and among the very white parts of the British Empire, or commonweal­th, as it is now known.

The royal family was clearly not ready for Meghan Markle — just as they were not ready for Princess Diana. Worse, though, is that little 1/ 4 Black Archie has been shunned and denied his royal privileges.

The result is a further deeply wounded, deeply scarred Prince Harry, who was cut off by his callous father, heir to the throne Prince Charles. Diana’s youngest son had to literally flee with his wife and child to America for safety and empathy.

The royals should be ashamed. And they should make this right with a formal apology to Meghan and to Harry, and Queen Elizabeth II should make a very public move to restore Archie to his rightful place as a welcomed and loved member of her royal family.

 ?? DOMINIC LIPINSKI/ AP ?? Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, with newborn baby Archie in May 2019.
DOMINIC LIPINSKI/ AP Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, with newborn baby Archie in May 2019.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States