USA TODAY International Edition

Our View: Guarantee fair and accessible elections

-

The next great debate for Congress is guaranteei­ng fair and accessible elections for American voters. We wish that was mere hyperbole, but it’s not. There is considerab­le election freedom at stake across the country as H. R. 1, otherwise known as the For the People Act, went to the Senate on Wednesday after approval early this month in the House of Representa­tives. The issue is breathtaki­ngly simple: h Passing H. R. 1 would make it easier to vote, building off the resounding success of the 2020 election, when more Americans than ever cast ballots.

h Rejecting H. R. 1 would make it more difficult to vote, particular­ly as Republican legislatur­es across the country institute “reforms” that would limit balloting.

The tragic paradox over voting rights is that steps taken by states to preserve voting integrity during a deadly pandemic — things like expanded mail balloting, early and curbside voting, and drop boxes for absentee ballots — are now being abolished by GOP legislatur­es in the name of voting integrity. Such proposals are underway in at least 43 states, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

How can that be? The reason, at its core, is that Donald Trump lost the presidenti­al election. Never one to admit defeat, the defeated Trump launched a disinforma­tion campaign so dishonest and so virulent that millions of supporters believed him ( and believe him still) when he said ( and still says) the election was stolen.

His Big Lie fomented an insurrecti­onal riot that led to the U. S. Capitol being overrun on Jan. 6 and put the lives of then- Vice President Mike Pence and members of Congress at risk.

Scores of judges, many of them Trump appointees, found no evidence of major voter fraud. And the same was true of audits, recounts and findings by state and federal election officials and Trump’s own attorney general. No election was stolen.

Trump’s own election security chief, a lifelong Republican, declared the 2020 presidenti­al vote one of the most secure in history — and was promptly fired for doing so.

Nonetheles­s, the Big Lie still became an article of faith within the vast Trump wing of the GOP. And for Republican politician­s, it proved to be a convenient excuse to roll back voting access that they believe advantages Democrats — despite the fact that Republican­s won in numerous down- ballot races across the country in November and won back swing seats in the House.

Pence articulate­d this dogma in a recent op- ed attacking H. R. 1: “I share the concerns of millions of Americans about the integrity of the 2020 election.” But he doesn’t mention how those “concerns” are the direct result of Trump’s widely promulgate­d Big Lie and not the facts.

H. R. 1 puts a stop to this dangerous nonsense.

The proposal draws on some of the best examples of improved voting access developed by various states and sets minimum standards all states must follow.

The Constituti­on grants Congress explicit power to take such steps ( the same authority that allowed for the pivotal Voting Rights Act of 1965 that did away with Jim Crow laws).

H. R. 1 would, among other things, establish minimum requiremen­ts allowing voting by mail, early voting, hours for voting to avoid long lines, and automatic and same- day voter registrati­on. It would prevent states from conducting certain forms of voting roll purges that would disenfranc­hise legitimate voters.

Somehow, these commonsens­e standards frighten Republican leaders.

“Everything about this bill is rotten to the core,” Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah told Fox News. “This is a bill as if written in hell by the devil himself.”

Certainly it’s true that as with any sweeping reform, H. R. 1, at 800 pages, is not perfect.

There are sections devoted to tightening campaign finance rules that risk violating constituti­onally protected speech and advocacy — the Americans Civil Liberties Union cited a dozen problems that could chill public electionee­ring discourse.

Such areas would need to be jettisoned or revised.

But the bottom line is that without a federal law guaranteei­ng that voting access will be preserved, fewer Americans will vote in 2022 and 2024 because of restrictio­ns being imposed in dozens of states.

And most Americans get it. Surveys show a majority of rank- and- file Democrats, independen­ts and even Republican­s favor H. R. 1.

They know that the more people vote, the healthier American democracy will be.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States