USA TODAY International Edition

Republican­s pan Biden’s spending plan as overly broad

- Joey Garrison

WASHINGTON – Before President Joe Biden even offered specifics of his aim to fix the nation’s roads, bridges and railways, Republican­s he’ll need to work with in Congress panned it, saying it goes too far beyond traditiona­l infrastruc­ture spending and comparing its climate aspects to the Green New Deal.

Republican­s argue the package should be limited to transporta­tion, broadband internet and other basics, not green energy like Biden has touted since he was a candidate. Biden doesn’t want to just fix roads, Republican­s warn, he wants to upend American life.

They’ve also balked at raising taxes – long a sticking point for Republican­s to get behind big- ticket Democratic programs. To find bipartisan support, the president will have to persuade skeptical Republican­s to support an increase of the corporate tax rate to pay for infrastruc­ture and a wide range of other spending.

These dynamics foreshadow a possi

ble repeat of Biden’s first major legislativ­e victory, when he won approval of a $ 1.9 trillion COVID- 19 relief package, the American Rescue Plan, last month without a single Republican supporter in Congress.

“What taxes are the Republican­s who want infrastruc­ture spending for?” said Matt Grossman, who heads the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research at Michigan State University. “I think the answer is not many. And if so, they won’t be ones that Democrats are likely to support. So that, right off the top, limits the potential for bipartisan­ship pretty fundamenta­lly.”

Biden’s proposal – in addition to addressing roads, bridges, railways and broadband – includes spending on manufactur­ing, research and developmen­t and “the caregiving economy.”

‘ A Trojan horse,’ GOP warns

The White House has billed the proposal as a way to create “good- paying union jobs” and a first step toward economic recovery amid the coronaviru­s pandemic. A second proposal in Biden’s “Build Back Better” agenda addressing health care, education and child care is expected later in April.

To build their case for the large infusion of domestic spending, the White House said the U. S. ranks 13th globally in infrastruc­ture quality, down from fifth in 2002, and significantly lags rival superpower China in infrastruc­ture spending. More than one- third of America’s bridges need repairs, and one in every five highways are in poor condition.

“We know that 80% or more of people in this country, Democrats and Republican­s, support investing in infrastruc­ture,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said.

Yet Republican lawmakers have spent recent days fine- tuning their attacks.

“We’re hearing the next few months might bring a so- called infrastruc­ture proposal that may actually be a Trojan horse for massive tax hikes and other job- killing left- wing policies,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, RKy., said from the Senate floor last week.

His office seized on recent comments from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez, DN. Y., likening the proposal to the Green New Deal, a sweeping environmen­tal effort pushed by Democrats to fight climate change. “Sold as an infrastruc­ture plan,” warned Scott Sloofman, a top McConnell aide, it “actually intends to reshape the U. S. economy and other parts of American life.”

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R- W. Va., the leading Republican on the Senate’s Environmen­t and Public Works Committee, said she’s “very disappoint­ed” the plan could include social programs in addition to infrastruc­ture.

“They’re terming it ‘ social infrastruc­ture.’ Never heard that before,” Capito said, predicting a hard legislativ­e fight. “I think we need to talk to the American people and say: ‘ Is this what you envision with infrastruc­ture? Are these job creators? Are we reengineer­ing our own social fabric here with a 50- vote majority?’ ”

House Republican­s warned Biden’s transporta­tion secretary, Pete Buttigieg, that any plan that strays from core transporta­tion priorities won’t get GOP support. “I don’t think the bill can grow into a multi- trillion- dollar catch- all,” s aid Missouri Rep. Sam Graves, the top Republican on the House Transporta­tion & Infrastruc­ture Committee. “A transporta­tion bill needs to be a transporta­tion bill, not a Green New Deal. It needs to be about roads and bridges.”

Former President Donald Trump repeatedly promised an infrastruc­ture package but never delivered one.

The road to passage

Democrats could choose to pass the infrastruc­ture legislatio­n in the Senate through budget reconcilia­tion – just like they did Biden’s COVID- 19 relief bill known as the American Rescue Plan – which would require just a simple majority in the evenly split chamber and therefore no Republican votes.

In an interview Monday on CNN, Buttigieg said he believes there’s “a tremendous opportunit­y now to have bipartisan support for a big, bold vision of infrastruc­ture,” arguing Americans “don’t need a lot of selling” on the proposal.

He also defended the inclusion of green investment­s in the infrastruc­ture package.

“You can’t separate the climate part from this vision,” he said, “because every road we fix, every bridge we build, we can either do it in a way that’s better for the climate or worse for the climate. Why wouldn’t we want to be creating these jobs in a way that’s better for the climate?”

Buttigieg said he believes the administra­tion can get Republican votes on infrastruc­ture, adding “We’re going to work with them to try shape it in a way that earns as much support as possible.”

To pay for the sweeping package, Biden wants to make large corporatio­ns pay more taxes. He will propose increasing the corporate tax rate to 28% and overhaulin­g how the U. S. taxes multinatio­nal corporatio­ns by increasing the minimum tax on U. S. corporatio­ns to 21%. The White House eliminated user fees, such as a gas tax, to pay for the infrastruc­ture plan.

Public support for infrastruc­ture

A poll this month from The HillHarris­X found 54% of American voters believe an infrastruc­ture package should be a priority right now for the federal government, compared with 46% who said other initiative­s should. Sixty percent of Democrats, 54% of independen­ts and 46% of Republican­s agreed infrastruc­ture should be prioritize­d.

“To have a bill like this that can generate jobs, help improve transporta­tion, and infrastruc­ture in general is a win- win all around,” said David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center. “Paying for it, obviously, is going to be the sticking point for Republican­s.”

Green energy investment­s are also popular among the public, according to Grossman. And while polls generally find opposition to raising the federal tax on gas to pay for infrastruc­ture, the public gives higher marks to raising taxes for corporatio­ns and higher- income Americans.

“In that sense, this developing bill does have the potential to at least start out with bipartisan support in the public,” Grossman said.

Such a scenario would also reflect the dynamics of Biden’s relief bill, which multiple polls found was backed by more than 70% of Americans. But as Biden learned, that doesn’t mean Republican­s in Congress will jump on board.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R- S. C., called an infrastruc­ture package the “the best chance” for Republican­s and Democrats to do something together, saying “Everybody needs roads and bridges and ports.”

But, he added, “we just want to make sure it’s related to infrastruc­ture.”

 ??  ?? Capito
Capito
 ??  ?? Buttigieg
Buttigieg

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States