USA TODAY International Edition

Far too many government documents are classified

- James Rosen James Rosen is a former Pentagon reporter for McClatchy who earlier covered the collapse of the Soviet Union as a Moscow correspond­ent.

The documents controvers­y has expanded beyond former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden. Classified documents have now been found at former Vice President Mike Pence’s home, a representa­tive for Pence wrote to the National Archives in letters this month.

The document cases dramatize what national security experts of every political stripe have known for decades: Far too many U. S. government records are classified.

An example is the classification of millions of documents ostensibly tied to President John F. Kennedy’s assassinat­ion: Each release of a new trove, most recently last month, has prompted questions about why most were classified in the first place.

In examining another American tragedy, the bipartisan 9/ 11 commission found that far from protecting the United States, excessive classification had left our country vulnerable to the terror attacks by restrictin­g important intelligen­ce findings about al- Qaida and other jihadist groups to too few essential U. S. security figures.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R- Utah, said at a 2016 House hearing that the government had spent $ 100 billion over the previous decade on “security classification activities” – much of them unnecessar­y, and some of them harmful.

You can draw a direct line from the needless classification of material stretching back well over a half- century, deep into the Cold War, to today’s toxic distrust of the government among tens of millions of Americans.

In supporting legislatio­n to streamline the classification system, The Washington Post editoriali­zed in 1998: “Excessive secrecy is expensive, breeds popular distrust of government and withholds from historians, researcher­s and the voting public informatio­n that is important.”

That measure failed to pass, instead giving rise to a bureaucrac­y now at the center of the Trump and Biden imbroglios – the National Archives and Records Administra­tion.

Soviet- like collection fiefdom

The late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover bears some responsibi­lity.

As the first head of the domestic intelligen­ce agency, he turned it into a vast, Soviet- like collection fiefdom that too often had more to do with his personal procliviti­es and animositie­s than with the nation’s security. Belatedly released records show that he paid informants and planted listening devices to gather evidence of alleged extramarit­al affairs and communist ties of Martin Luther King Jr.

In 2021, USA TODAY quoted a Senate report’s conclusion that the Commerce Department had acted as “a rogue, unaccounta­ble police force across multiple presidenti­al administra­tions” in targeting its Asian American employees. The report found that a department­al division called the Investigat­ions and Threat Management Service had used “overclassi­fication of documents to protect the unit from external scrutiny.”

The federal classification system has three main tiers: Top Secret, Secret and Confidential. The most highly sensitive records are stamped Top Secret and truly need to be closely guarded, seen by a limited number of vetted officials with high- security clearances, in order to protect the United States against real harm by foreign or domestic enemies.

They can be viewed only in SCIFs – Sensitive Compartmen­ted Informatio­n Facilities that look like giant bank vaults and normally can be accessed only by accredited individual­s using eye scans, fingerprints or complex entry codes.

But far too many Secret or Confidential documents protect the individual reputation­s of analysts whose forecasts proved disastrous­ly wrong.

An example is the lead- up to the Iraq War debacle when Vice President Dick Cheney made unpreceden­ted personal visits to Langley to pressure senior CIA officials to alter intel assessment­s in order to support a U. S. invasion and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

As a Moscow correspond­ent, I shared lunch or drinks with U. S. Embassy diplomats who confided that much of the informatio­n they weren’t allowed to tell journalist­s came from reading those journalist­s’ articles!

Later, as a Pentagon reporter, I was frustrated by military or civilian officials who’d tell me things off the record or on background that were either common knowledge, available online or had no possible intelligen­ce value.

A major flaw in today’s classification system is that it was created in the preinterne­t era when informatio­n was much less fungible.

In addition to frustratin­g journalist­s, the overclassi­fication and extended retention of government records stifle academic research, which policymake­rs depend on to make informed decisions.

Responses from Trump, Biden

The problem with Trump’s response to FBI inquiries of the Mar- a- Lago documents, as with his responses to so much scrutiny of him, is that his overwrough­t, accusatory declaratio­ns make them appear more sensitive than most of them probably are.

Far savvier is Biden’s apparent response of disclosure and cooperatio­n to the more recent discovery of classified records at the Penn Biden Center in the nation’s capital and at his own home in Delaware.

History suggests that the bulk of the restricted documents found in both presidents’ personal possession contain informatio­n already in the public domain – or informatio­n that should be in the public domain.

Unfortunat­ely, Americans likely won’t learn this key fact until it is much too late to matter.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States