USA TODAY US Edition

Failed Halliburto­n tie-up to spur oil deals, cost-cutting

Analysts expect oil prices to edge back up.

- Nathan Bomey @NathanBome­y

The collapse of the proposed tie-up between oilfield services giants Halliburto­n and Baker Hughes may trigger a wave of consolidat­ion and further cost cutting as the industry reels from low oil prices.

Baker Hughes on Monday announced plans to shed $500 million in costs after the U.S. Justice Department blocked the company’s sale to rival Halliburto­n on antitrust concerns.

Now, some analysts are anticipati­ng a fresh round of mergers, acquisitio­ns and restructur­ing to cope with low cash flow from crude oil’s decline. Halliburto­n and Baker Hughes, however, are viewed as financiall­y resilient enough to ride out the cycle.

“The initial thought was that divestitur­es from the deal would shape the profile of the industry with many players waiting to see how the process would shake out,” Deutsche Bank analyst Mike Urban wrote in a research note to investors. “With the deal now called off, we believe it could set off a wave of industry restructur­ing/consolidat­ion.”

Many analysts expect oil prices, now in the mid-$40s a barrel, to edge back to the $50-to$60 range by the second half of the year, but that would still not be enough to make many companies profitable on their own.

Baker Hughes will immediatel­y begin cost-cutting measures.

Halliburto­n will pay a $3.5 billion breakup fee to Baker Hughes, which will in turn devote $1.5 billion of that to share buybacks and $1 billion to repay debt. The fee is fairly generous and could strengthen Baker Hughes, says Jim Milligan, a natural resource analyst at Olivetree Securities.

Though investors anticipate­d potential opposition to the tie-up when it was revealed in late November 2014, the government’s exuberant reaction to the merger’s demise underscore­s the risks big companies face at the altar.

“The hurdle is higher because it’s more of an active DOJ, and the Obama administra­tion is on its way out, so obviously it wants to leave more of a footprint,” Milligan says.

The deal was once valued at $34 billion. Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Gelfand of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division told reporters the deal “would have harmed energy companies and would have harmed American consumers.”

Baker Hughes shares fell 2% Thursday to $47.40. Halliburto­n rose 2% to $42.05.

The Obama administra­tion hailed the deal’s demise, trumpeting the growing list of mergers blocked as regulators increase scrutiny of potentiall­y anti-competitiv­e deals. The administra­tion has killed more than 30 “anticompet­itive mergers,” Gelfand says. Some 130 mergers have been blocked or altered through settlement­s such as divestitur­es.

 ?? 2011 PHOTO BY AFP/GETTY IMAGES ?? Halliburto­n says it will pay a $3.5 billion breakup fee to Baker Hughes.
2011 PHOTO BY AFP/GETTY IMAGES Halliburto­n says it will pay a $3.5 billion breakup fee to Baker Hughes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States