USA TODAY US Edition

‘Swinger’ general slipped by screeners

Case exposes cracks in national security vetting process

- Tom Vanden Brook @tvandenbro­ok USA TODAY

The Pentagon’s failure to detect the extramarit­al affair and “swinger lifestyle” of a top general despite background checks that likely included polygraph tests exposes flaws in vetting those entrusted with the nation’s most sensitive national security secrets, according to experts and a top senator.

The Army fired Maj. Gen. David Haight from his job overseeing operations at European Command earlier this year after investigat­ors uncovered his double life. Haight’s post required him to have access to the military’s classified capabiliti­es to thwart Russian aggression, and his double life would have put him at risk of being blackmaile­d, several senior officials have said.

But Haight’s dark secret came to light only after the military received anonymous tips about his 11-year extramarit­al affair and other sexual escapades and began investigat­ing in December.

Officials entrusted with the most sensitive informatio­n undergo background checks and liedetecto­r tests every five years, meaning Haight passed at least two while he was having an affair.

His case shows that a determined and capable liar can evade detection, experts say.

“It’s disappoint­ing to see senior officers behave this way, and that the system is unable to identify people with integrity problems,” said Derek Reveron, professor of national security affairs at the Naval War College. “Adultery clearly illustrate­s someone who displays bad judgment and is untrustwor­thy — red flags in background investigat­ions.”

But Reveron added, “Unless someone who is interviewe­d raises an issue, then there’s no way to know if people have second lives.”

The Haight case shows that more needs to been done to detect potential threats to national security secrets, said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. She has advocated for more stringent background checks following the massive leak of security secrets by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden and the attack by a contractor with a security clearance who killed 12 people at the Navy Yard here in 2013.

“As we’ve seen, these background investigat­ions aren’t foolproof, especially if the subjects aren’t truthful,” McCaskill said.

Haight would have been subject to some of the most careful screening the government conducts, said Scott “Dutch” Murray, a retired Air Force colonel.

Murray, a career intelligen­ce officer, served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanista­n and helped plot targets against the Islamic State. Murray underwent multiple checks at five-year intervals and described the process.

A lengthy questionna­ire known as Standard Form 86 seeks detail about the applicant’s family, friends and finances. Lying on the form is a felony. Screeners also interview friends and neighbors.

As the director of operations for European Command, Haight would also have required higher clearances including for Special Technical Operations.

“That’s where you have to take lie-detector tests,” Murray said. “They’re trying to find out your vulnerabil­ity to blackmail or extortion.”

One question Murray was asked: Have you lied to your wife?

Haight evidently passed his liedetecto­r tests. Perhaps that’s not a surprise. A National Academy of Sciences report in 2003 questioned the value of the counterint­elligence polygraph test. The academy concluded that the polygraph flagged too many innocent people and failed to find enough spies.

Haight would have been privy to the most advanced U.S. capabiliti­es to counter Russian aggression, allied troop movements and likely the war effort against the Islamic State since Turkey is in EUCOM’s sphere, Murray said.

The Army’s inspector general, acting on a referral from an anonymous tipster, found that Haight had an inappropri­ate sexual relationsh­ip and had misused his government email and cellphone. The report on Haight used the definition of swinging as, “Being promiscuou­s, typically engaging in group sex or swapping sexual partners.”

Emails obtained by USA TODAY showed Haight and his girlfriend setting up assignatio­ns with other women and couples, and explicit references to oral and anal sex.

The Army fired him from his job in Europe and pulled him back to Washington where a board will determine the rank at which he retires.

Meanwhile, Haight’s security clearance has been suspended while investigat­ors review his case, according to Col. Patrick Seiber, an Army spokesman.

It could be reinstated or revoked, in which case Haight could appeal.

 ?? U.S. ARMY ?? David Haight
U.S. ARMY David Haight

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States