USA TODAY US Edition

CLUELESS TRUMPS AND CLINTONS

Nominees, their families have sunk to astonishin­g lows of self-awareness

- Steven Straussis the John L. Weinberg/ Goldman Sachs & Co. Visiting Professor at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and Internatio­nal Affairs. Steven Strauss

Donald Trump interrupte­d himself during a speech and proudly pointed to a man in the audience. Look at “my African American,” he said. Since some state polls show Trump at 0% among African Americans, he might have been pointing at his only black supporter.

Not to be outdone on cluelessne­ss, Hillary Clinton told us that victims of sexual assault have the right to be believed. Clinton’s husband has been accused of rape and sexual harassment, has paid almost $1 million to settle a sexual harassment claim, and was required to surrender his law license because of his lies during a sexual harassment suit. Did Hillary Clinton mean that her husband was a serial sexual predator (since his accusers should be believed), or that different rules apply to people named Clinton?

The Trump and Clinton children have inherited their parents’ lack of self-awareness.

The Trumps shared a picture of themselves bearing the caption, “This is not a Republican vs. Democrat election. This is about an insider vs. an outsider.” But Trump and his family aren’t “outsiders” — they are serious insiders.

The Trump children are the third generation of an extremely rich American family. They didn’t attend public schools. They went to expensive preparator­y schools (tuition $40,000 to $60,000 a year), followed by high-priced private colleges. The Clintons (among many other high-profile, well-connected guests) attended their dad’s most recent wedding (where the estimated cost of the bride’s dress was $100,000 and her ring $1.5 million). DAUGHTER OF THE CLINTONS Chelsea Clinton is also a strong competitor in the clueless category. “I was curious if I could care about (money) on some fundamenta­l level,” she once told Fast

Company, “and I couldn’t.” This perhaps explains why: She has a net worth of $15 million, she married a wealthy hedge fund executive, she lives in a $10 million apartment, and she had a $3 million wedding. Imagine what her lifestyle would be like if money really mattered to her?

Chelsea also serves as a board member of the IAC/InterActiv­e Corp. (which pays her about $300,000 a year for a part-time job, not including stock awards). It’s hard to disagree with The

New York Times blogger who said she got the board position (at the age of 31) “only because she is the daughter of ” the Clintons, in an appointmen­t that “defies American conception­s of meritocrac­y.”

Trump tells working-class Americans the system is rigged against them. Nothing demonstrat­es the sincerity of his fight against a rigged system more than his naming Ivanka, Eric and Donald Jr. as executive vice presidents of the Trump Organizati­on.

Hillary Clinton speaks of the need to create greater opportunit­ies for all Americans. Nothing shows her commitment to equality of opportunit­y better than naming her daughter to the Clinton Foundation board, making her vice chair of the foundation. ‘OPPORTUNIT­Y HOARDING’ Both candidates’ families are examples of why we no longer lead the world in equality of opportunit­y. An academical­ly high-performing child from a poor family stands less chance of graduating college than an academical­ly underperfo­rming child from an affluent family.

Affluent families engage in what’s known as “opportunit­y hoarding ” — a fancy way of saying all the special possibilit­ies available to the Trump and Clinton children (and children like them) are possibilit­ies not easily available to ordinary Americans.

The Trumps, the Clintons and most members of our elites (left and right) show a startling lack of self-awareness of the role socioecono­mic privilege has played in their success. Both the Trumps and the Clintons surround themselves with members of their own social class, which might explain why both presidenti­al nominees are so clueless.

I’m not suggesting, however, that the two nominees’ lack of self-awareness presents a false equivalenc­e between them.

Judging by his campaign and career, Trump would be an incompeten­t, corrupt crony capitalist, racist demagogic president. As Michael Bloomberg remarked: “Trump says he wants to run the nation like he’s run his business. God help us.”

At worst, Trump could be a real threat to our democracy.

Clinton, in the worst case, at least knows the issues, knows how to make things work, and is not an incompeten­t racist — which in this election makes her the safer and better choice.

 ?? JENNIFER S. ALTMAN, FOR THE WASHINGTON POST VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? Ivanka, Eric and Donald Trump Jr. shared this photo with the presidenti­al campaign caption: “This is not a Republican vs. Democrat election. This is about an insider vs. an outsider.”
JENNIFER S. ALTMAN, FOR THE WASHINGTON POST VIA GETTY IMAGES Ivanka, Eric and Donald Trump Jr. shared this photo with the presidenti­al campaign caption: “This is not a Republican vs. Democrat election. This is about an insider vs. an outsider.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States