SPILL DETAILS ON RUSSIA EMAIL HACK
Public deserves fast, full accounting of stunning election interference
In his remaining time in office, perhaps the most difficult decision President Obama will face is how the United States should respond to the stunning Russian cyberattack on our electoral system: the penetration of Democratic National Committee servers and the email account of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.
Donald Trump, despite having received classified briefings on the Russian cyber threat, has refused to accept the intelligence community’s judgment that such an attack took place. If Obama does not act in his final weeks, it is a virtual certainty that President Trump will not act either. As the beneficiary of the hacking, and as an admirer of Russian strongman Vladimir Putin, Trump would have every reason to let it slide.
Options for a response have already been outlined in a paper that has made its way to Obama’s desk. They are, of course, top secret, but last month Vice President Biden told NBC’s Meet the
Press that we would be “sending a message” to Putin “under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact.”
ALL TALK
That was tough talk, but an unfortunate axiom applies to the Obama administration: The tougher the talk, the lower the likelihood commensurate action will follow. That rule is especially likely to pertain in this instance because all the imaginable options are so unattractive.
Among other capabilities, the Pentagon’s cyber command or the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence could send signals into Russian computers that could wreak destruction. Already back in the Cold War, the CIA planted “Trojan horse” computer chips in turbine technology the KGB was stealing from the West to control the flow of natural gas in Siberian pipelines. The result was the largest non-nuclear explosion ever seen from outer space.
We could undoubtedly repeat such a feat with the right sequence of key strokes on a laptop at CIA headquarters, causing major pieces of Russia’s infrastructure to fail catastrophically. But the Russians could retaliate just as easily, and they probably would. Given how computerized our economy is, we stand to lose a lot more than we would gain. Mutual assured destruction applies to the cyber age just as it did (and does) in the nuclear age.
Another alternative is to make public some portion of the enor- mous trove of documents the CIA undoubtedly possesses that demonstrate massive corruption by Putin and his cronies. But every Russian already knows they have pillaged the country’s treasure for personal gain. The major effect of such a U.S. action would be to induce a collective yawn.
Indictments? Sanctions? Both have been employed in response to past bouts of North Korean and Chinese hacking, and both would induce more yawns. Moreover, whatever punitive economic measures Obama puts in place today, President Trump could reverse Jan. 20. Unless we settle for some petty retaliatory hacking of little moment, it would seem that we’re out of tricks.
THE RUSSIAN CANDIDATE
Still, even if there is no effective means of retaliation, there remains one thing Obama must do. The Russia-WikiLeaks assault on our electoral process was one of the most consequential influence operations in modern history. The public deserves a full accounting of what happened.
The intelligence community should lay out what it knows. Even if this means disclosing sensitive sources and methods, a timeline, a list of players, a description of the technology in- volved and any and all relevant evidence should be put into the public domain in a report prepared and signed by trusted blueribbon names.
If we do not obtain a documented account before Inauguration Day, the incoming Trump administration will have every incentive to erase the evidentiary trail. Trump has exhibited no compunctions about falsifying far more trivial things. His designated national security adviser, retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn, is a brazen Putinophile who has taken money from RT, Moscow’s principal English-language propaganda organ. Flynn will only be too happy to go along.
As we draw closer to the moment Trump takes the oath of office, the American people deserve an accounting that clears up as thoroughly as possible all questions about one of the many extraordinary aspects of the 2016 presidential campaign: how a candidate favored by Russia, and who favors Russia, was helped by Russia to ascend to the most powerful position in the world.