USA TODAY US Edition

No more shirking

Brian Kelly should accept responsibi­lity after NCAA punishes Notre Dame, writes columnist,

- Nancy Armour narmour@usatoday.com USA TODAY Sports FOLLOW COLUMNIST NANCY ARMOUR @nrarmour for analysis and breaking sports news.

The poor results on the field — the seven-loss debacle of a season — are nothing compared with the embarrassm­ent and shame Brian Kelly just brought on Notre Dame.

Kelly refused to accept any responsibi­lity Tuesday for NCAA violations that resulted in the Irish being stripped of 21 victories from the 2012 and 2013 seasons. The 12-1 record in 2012 that included a trip to the Bowl Championsh­ip Series title game, easily the high point of Kelly’s contentiou­s tenure, is vanished.

And right along with it Notre Dame’s moral high ground.

Notre Dame has always prided itself on being different, a cut above the college athletics world that, let’s be frank, sometimes looks more like a cesspool. It only recruited players of the highest quality, their character as sterling as their talent. Its coaches were role models for doing things the right way, refusing to compromise their ethics for a couple of extra wins.

Turns out, Notre Dame’s principles are every bit as malleable as the Miamis, the Auburns and all those other schools it has looked down upon over the years.

It’s true that Kelly did not have any direct involvemen­t in the violations. The NCAA Division I Committee on Infraction­s found that a student trainer had violated NCAA rules by committing academic misconduct for two foot- ball players and providing six others with impermissi­ble extra academic benefits.

“It was student-on-student cheating,” Kelly said. “This matter has nothing to do with me and my status here.”

Wrong. As head coach, it is Kelly’s job to know everything that’s going on with his team, the good and the bad.

Maybe Kelly wouldn’t have firsthand knowledge. But when a team is this high profile, on a campus as insulated as Notre Dame’s, it’s implausibl­e to think people didn’t know about the shadiness. If he or his assistants didn’t hear the whispers and the rumors, it’s because they didn’t want to.

If you want to take credit when the going is good, then you’d better be prepared to accept the blame when things go wrong, too.

And that, even more than his team’s woeful record, will be Kelly’s undoing. He has had no problem throwing others under the bus when things have gone wrong — you could make a YouTube video of his sideline tantrums alone — and had the audacity to preach about the need for accountabi­lity when he discipline­d six players who were arrested before the season.

“You want them to enjoy their time here, but they’ve got to make good decisions,” Kelly said in a radio interview after the Au- gust arrests. “And then if they don’t, hold them accountabl­e for it, and we certainly have done that.”

Yet Kelly has shown time and again that his standards don’t apply to him.

When a video tower collapsed in October 2010, killing a Notre Dame student who was taping practice, Kelly defended his decision to practice outdoors that day by saying conditions “were not unlike many days that I had practiced.” I lived in South Bend for 31⁄ years, and I can say with total 2 certitude that winds gusting up to 53 mph are not typical.

When Lizzy Seeberg committed suicide in September 2010 after accusing linebacker Prince Shembo of sexual assault, Kelly was one of several university administra­tors who tried to sweep it under the rug.

Compared with those two incidents, the NCAA violations are minor. But it fits the pattern: Nothing is ever Brian Kelly’s fault.

The role of a college coach is twofold: Win games and try to set a good example for the young men he’s molding.

In both cases, Brian Kelly is failing miserably.

 ?? LOGAN BOWLES, USA TODAY SPORTS ?? “This matter has nothing to do with me,” Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly said of a student trainer’s academic misconduct.
LOGAN BOWLES, USA TODAY SPORTS “This matter has nothing to do with me,” Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly said of a student trainer’s academic misconduct.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States