USA TODAY US Edition

Why Clinton is backing recounts

-

Excerpts from a statement posted on Medium by Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias:

Over the last few days, officials in the Clinton campaign have received hundreds of messages, emails, and calls urging us to do something, anything, to investigat­e claims that the election results were hacked and altered in a way to disadvanta­ge Secretary Clinton.

The concerns have arisen, in particular, with respect to Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvan­ia — three states that together proved decisive in this presidenti­al election and where the combined margin of victory for Donald Trump was merely 107,000 votes.

We certainly understand the heartbreak felt by so many who worked so hard to elect Hillary Clinton, and it is a fundamenta­l principle of our democracy to ensure that every vote is properly counted.

Moreover, this election cycle was unique in the degree of foreign interferen­ce witnessed throughout the campaign: the U.S. government concluded that Russian state actors were behind the hacks of the Democratic National Committee and the personal email accounts of Hillary for America campaign officials.

For all these reasons, we have quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibilit­y of outside interferen­ce in the vote tally in these critical battlegrou­nd states.

Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this (recount) option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participat­e in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides. If Jill Stein follows through as she has promised and pursues recounts in Pennsylvan­ia and Michigan, we will take the same approach in those states as well.

We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states — Michigan — well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount. But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represente­d in any court proceeding­s and represente­d on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States