USA TODAY US Edition

A bad deal for American families

- By Thomas Pyle Thomas Pyle is the president of the Institute for Energy Research.

One of the unsung marvels of modern life is the availabili­ty of affordable and reliable energy. It’s how we fuel our cars, keep the lights on and maintain the perfect temperatur­e in our homes regardless of the season. For most Americans, the energy we use is an afterthoug­ht, but a tax proposal being floated in Washington would change all that.

This week, a small group of out-of-touch Republican­s pitched the Trump administra­tion on what they call a “freemarket” carbon tax. However, there is nothing free-market about a punishing new tax that would saddle Americans with higher energy costs.

Their plan calls for a $40per-ton carbon tax that would fall mainly on the use of natural gas, oil and coal, which make up 80% of the energy Americans use.

Levying a massive tax on the use of these sources would burden American families with higher energy costs, including an estimated 36-cent-per-gallon hike in gasoline prices alone. It would also force Americans to pay more for their groceries and other household goods because energy costs are embedded in every aspect of the economy.

The authors of this carbon tax plan assure us that the $300 billion in new annual revenue would be refunded back to the people in the form of rebate checks. However, this promise is unrealisti­c, if not downright impossible.

Where Americans see a devastatin­g new tax, Washington lawmakers see a new stream of revenue to increase government spending. It is naive to expect lawmakers to suddenly change their out-of-control spending habits.

The plan also calls on President Trump to scrap existing carbon regulation­s. But that deal is unnecessar­y, as the president has already promised to undo those regulation­s.

American families depend on affordable, reliable energy to power their lives. This plan would drive up the cost of that energy, while putting more money at the disposal of politician­s in Washington. The plan is not free-market at all, but another example of government nibbling away at the hardearned incomes of Americans.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States