USA TODAY US Edition

High court blocks districts based on race

Justices vote 7-1 to send issue of targeting blacks in Va. back to panel for new criteria

- Richard Wolf @richardjwo­lf USA TODAY

The Supreme Court dealt another blow Wednesday against the use of race in drawing election districts, demanding further review of 11 state legislativ­e districts that Virginia Republican­s designed to ensure that 55% of eligible voters were black.

The 7-1 ruling was at least a temporary victory for Democrats who challenged 12 districts drawn after the 2010 Census by the GOP-led state Legislatur­e. They argued that the maps were drawn to pack more blacks than necessary into those districts to give Republican­s the advantage in surroundin­g districts.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his opinion that districts can be held unconstitu­tional “if race for its own sake is the overriding reason for choosing one map over others” — even if the districts meet traditiona­l redistrict­ing criteria, such as compactnes­s. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part.

The high court did not settle the issue. The justices sent the case back to a three-judge trial court with instructio­ns to use different criteria to determine whether the Legislatur­e violated the Constituti­on by setting racial targets. They upheld a 12th district as having 55% black voters for legitimate reasons.

The justices did not rule on a similar case from North Carolina heard in December, in which Democratic challenger­s said two congressio­nal districts were drawn with the same intent — to pack African Americans into some districts so others would be safer for Republican­s. That decision could come soon.

Democratic Party attorney Marc Elias heralded the Virginia ruling as a “major victory.” In a briefing a day earlier, he said the two cases “could further the trend of courts cracking down on racial gerrymande­ring.”

The justices did not go that far. They sent the case back, so a trial court panel can decide whether race was the predominan­t motive for the design of the 11 districts.

Two decades ago, Democrats used the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to demand “majority-minority” districts. After Republican­s took over many state legislatur­es in 2010, they began drawing districts with what critics claimed were more African Americans than necessary.

The Virginia case involves 12 House of Delegates districts in the central and southern part of the state that were drawn to include a minimum of 55% black voters. A federal district court panel upheld the lines, which Paul Clement, representi­ng the Legislatur­e, said were used to protect black voters and lawmakers from a potentiall­y low African-American turnout.

Districts can be held unconstitu­tional “if race for its own sake is the overriding reason for choosing one map over others.” Justice Anthony Kennedy

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, AP ?? The Supreme Court ruled that Virginia Republican­s probably relied on race to draw 11 state legislativ­e districts.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, AP The Supreme Court ruled that Virginia Republican­s probably relied on race to draw 11 state legislativ­e districts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States