USA TODAY US Edition

White House under ‘big gray cloud’

- Susan Page

WASHINGTON Not since Watergate. FBI Director James Comey delivered more than one bombshell Monday at a rare public hearing of the House Intelligen­ce Committee. He said there was no evidence to back up President Trump’s accusation that President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign, joining congressio­nal leaders and intelligen­ce officials in discountin­g Trump’s unsubstant­iated claims.

What was more explosive was Comey’s matter-of-fact confirmati­on that the FBI is investigat­ing whether Trump associates colluded with Russia in the effort by one of the United States’ leading global adversarie­s to affect the outcome of the presidenti­al campaign.

To be sure, the FBI in recent years has been drawn into investigat­ions involving the top ranks of the White House, from Scooter Libby’s leaking of a CIA operative’s name during the George W. Bush administra­tion to President Clinton’s relationsh­ip with Monica Lewinsky. But not since the Watergate scandal that forced President Nixon to resign more than a

National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers says U.S. authoritie­s didn’t seek the help of British intelligen­ce to conduct surveillan­ce.

Sean Spicer said “nothing had changed” as a result of Comey’s appearance before the committee.

“Investigat­ing (Russian interferen­ce) and having proof of it are two different things,” Spicer said.

For weeks, federal law enforcemen­t officials have privately confirmed the existence of an inquiry involving Trump associates and Russia, but Comey’s public acknowledg­ment of such an investigat­ion — with no apparent timeline for completion — raised the prospect that a criminal probe will indefinite­ly shadow the administra­tion along with the disputed wiretap claims.

Comey’s denial that Trump Tower was illegally wiretapped before the elections came days after House and Senate leaders rejected the claims in bipartisan joint statements, leaving the White House alone in asserting the allegation­s.

“Let me be clear,” House Intelligen­ce Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said Monday, “we know there was not a wiretap on Trump Tower. However, it’s still possible that other surveillan­ce activities were used against President Trump and his associates.”

California Rep. Adam Schiff, the House committee’s ranking Democrat, called Trump’s claims “slanderous,” adding that “we do not yet know whether the Russians had the help of U.S. citizens, including people associated with the Trump campaign.”

Schiff said the effort to determine the scope of Russian interferen­ce in the election system represente­d the most important challenge for U.S. intelligen­ce.

“The stakes are nothing less than the future of liberal democracy,” Schiff said.

The false wiretap accusation has not only dogged the White House for the past three weeks, it also has triggered a diplomatic row with a key ally. Trump and aides cited a discredite­d report by Fox News commentato­r Andrew Napolitano that President Obama asked a British intelligen­ce agency to tap Trump. The British government strongly rejected the account Friday, and the Trump administra­tion pledged not to use the claim again. Asked about the flap during a joint White House appearance with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Trump said: “That was a statement made by a very talented lawyer on Fox, and so you shouldn’t be talking to me, you should be talking to Fox. OK?”

Monday, Rogers rejected that claim, too, telling the House panel that U.S. authoritie­s never sought the help of British intelligen­ce to conduct such surveillan­ce.

Asked whether the claims had damaged the relationsh­ip between the United States and its primary ally, Rogers said the report was “frustratin­g.”

“I don’t know the basis for President Trump’s assertion,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said Sunday. “I do believe he owes us that explanatio­n.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan, RW-is., sought to move beyond the dispute. “I want to get on with passing our agenda,” Ryan said.

The high-stakes House hearing Monday featured numerous efforts to press Comey and Rogers to disclose possible targets of the investigat­ion or issue preliminar­y conclusion­s on whether there is any evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russian officials.

Nunes and former director of national intelligen­ce James Clapper have said no such evidence of coordinati­on exists. Nunes reasserted that claim Monday, but Comey and Rogers repeatedly declined to comment on the matter.

The FBI director and Rogers declined numerous times to respond to questions about whether former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn was a subject of the FBI’s inquiry. Flynn was forced to resign last month after it was determined that he misled Vice President Pence about his pre-inaugural contacts with Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak.

Other top Trump advisers’ contacts with Kislyak have been called into question. Attorney General Jeff Sessions failed to disclose two encounters with the Russian ambassador when questioned during his confirmati­on hearing in January. The disclosure prompted Sessions’ recusal from any involvemen­t in the inquiry on Russia.

Committee Republican­s suggested Monday that the questions about Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak emerged only as a result of unauthoriz­ed leaks of classified informatio­n that appeared in media accounts. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Fla., pressed Comey to commit to moving forward with a parallel leak investigat­ion, even as the bureau pursued the Russia inquiry.

Though he characteri­zed such leaks as “terrible,” Comey again refused to address specific questions about Russian contact with Flynn and other Trump associates, including flamboyant adviser Roger Stone and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The committee hearing came a little more than two weeks after Trump leveled his accusation­s against Obama in a tweet storm. One tweet said, “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyis­m!”

The charges brought furious denials from Obama aides, who asserted that the law forbids presidents from ordering wiretaps.

Trump and aides have denied any connection to Russians who sought to hack Democratic officials during last year’s election and said opponents leak derogatory informatio­n against them as part of a “witch hunt” to undermine the presidency.

For Comey, Monday’s hearing represente­d another unusually high-profile role for the FBI director. Comey was harshly criticized by Republican­s for a public announceme­nt in July that he was not recommendi­ng criminal charges against Democratic presidenti­al candidate Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of State. He drew the wrath of Democrats in October for announcing that the bureau reopened its email review, 11 days before the presidenti­al election.

Monday, Comey was cautious not to indicate that the FBI had reached any determinat­ions about contacts with Russia, though he reasserted last year’s findings by the U.S. intelligen­ce community that Russia expressly sought to influence the election and favored Trump.

“They wanted to hurt (Clinton) and help him,” Comey said, adding that the conclusion was a “fairly easy judgment” by the intelligen­ce community.

 ??  ??
 ?? JACK GRUBER, USA TODAY ??
JACK GRUBER, USA TODAY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States