USA TODAY US Edition

NFL not upbeat on Oakland keeping Raiders

- Tom Pelissero @TomPelisse­ro USA TODAY Sports

Last-ditch efforts by Oakland leaders to keep the Raiders from moving to Las Vegas haven’t moved the ball with the NFL.

In a letter to Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, who publicly released additional details Friday of a plan the NFL deemed unworkable months ago, Commission­er Roger Goodell reiterated that key issues with the Oakland proposal remained unresolved. NFL owners will consider the Raiders’ relocation applicatio­n at the league meeting that began Sunday in Phoenix.

“Despite all of these efforts, ours and yours, we have not yet identified a viable solution,” Goodell wrote. “It is disappoint­ing to me and our clubs to have come to that conclusion.”

A vote could come as soon as Monday on the plan for a nearly $2 billion stadium project in Las Vegas. Momentum has been growing for approval since Bank of America stepped up as the Raiders’ new financing partner. Twenty-four of 32 owners would need to approve the move.

The full text of Goodell’s letter to Schaaf, sent late Friday, is below. Dear Mayor Schaaf: We have had an opportunit­y to review the material your office released today regarding a stadium project in Oakland for the Raiders.

Before addressing the substance of the material, I want to personally thank you for your leadership and for the time and effort you have devoted to addressing the Raiders’ stadium needs and to keeping Oakland as an NFL community. As you have said more than once, the unquestion­ed need to replace the current stadium has been hampered by a long record of unrealisti­c and unkept promises that has complicate­d your efforts and constraine­d your options. I know from my own discussion­s with you, as well as those that have involved our staffs, that you and your team have made every effort to be accessible, creative, and diligent in exploring alternativ­es. I am grateful to you for doing so, and our member clubs are as well.

I particular­ly want to thank you for meeting on two occasions with our Finance and Stadium Committees, and much of our executive staff, most recently at our committee meetings on March 6. Those two committees consist of 18 owners and have devoted considerab­le time and attention to the Raiders. They will be presenting their analysis and recommenda­tions to the full membership next week. Your presentati­ons to those committees, as well as the many discussion­s between our staffs, have been valuable in giving us an understand­ing of the opportunit­y available to the Raiders in Oakland.

The material that we reviewed earlier today confirms certain informatio­n that had previously been communicat­ed orally, such as a willingnes­s to bring bank financing to a stadium project, and a proposed valuation of the land at the Coliseum site. It also confirms that key issues that we have identified as threshold considerat­ions are simply not resolvable in a reasonable time. In that respect, the informatio­n sent today does not present a proposal that is clear and specific, actionable in a reasonable timeframe, and free of major contingenc­ies.

In making this assessment, we recognize and accept the core negotiatin­g principles that you have articulate­d as being appropriat­e to your community. A significan­t number of NFL clubs play in stadiums that have little or no public financial support (including the stadium being built in Los Angeles). We have long accepted your position that no public funds are available for stadium constructi­on in Oakland. We also accept that you do not wish to exercise (and may not be able to exercise) the contractua­l terminatio­n rights related to the A’s.

We have been prepared for nearly two years to work on finding a solution based on access to land at a certain cost, without constraint­s on the location of the stadium or timing of constructi­on, and clarity on overall developmen­t. However, at this date, there remains no certainty regarding how the site will be fully developed, or the specific and contractua­lly-defined nature of the participat­ion by Fortress or other parties. In addition, the long-term nature of the commitment to the A’s remains a significan­t complicati­on and the resolution of that issue remains unknown. Other significan­t uncertaint­ies, which we have previously identified, remain unaddresse­d.

We had hoped that the past two years would have allowed both of us to develop a viable project in Oakland. You have provided valuable leadership; for our part, our clubs have repeatedly delayed any relocation by the Raiders and committed an additional $100 million in NFL financial support ( for a total of $300 million) to a stadium project in Oakland. We have had regular communicat­ions with you, your staff, and more recently with Mr. (Ronnie) Lott and his colleagues. And of course, many of our owners have met with you directly, as noted earlier.

Despite all of these efforts, ours and yours, we have not yet identified a viable solution. It is disappoint­ing to me and our clubs to have come to that conclusion.

At our upcoming meeting, the clubs will consider the Raiders’ applicatio­n to move to Las Vegas. A key part of that discussion will be a thorough review of our collective efforts in Oakland. I will contact you promptly regarding any decisions made next week.

Thank you again for your leadership and for the material of earlier today. Sincerely, Roger Goodell

 ?? ERIC RISBERG, AP ?? Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, above, got a frank letter from Commission­er Roger Goodell.
ERIC RISBERG, AP Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, above, got a frank letter from Commission­er Roger Goodell.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States