USA TODAY US Edition

‘Last Neandertha­l’ is a blast from the (prehistori­c) past

Novel follows group of characters from both sides of timeline

- Emily Gray Tedrowe Special for USA TODAY

Readers have been captivated by stories of prehistori­c humans for eons — well, at least since Jean Auel’s phenomenal 1980 best seller The Clan of the Cave

Bear. Claire Cameron’s arresting new novel The Last Neandertha­l investigat­es the same time period with significan­tly more literary skill.

“If you happened on one in the woods — say, a female named Girl with a shock of red hair — it would not be by accident,” Cameron writes. “She would have sensed you coming long before, felt curious about another upright primate, and allowed you to approach.”

The opening section of The Last Neandertha­l (Little, Brown, 272 pp., out of four) eeeE imagines this theoretica­l moment of connection between two species, one long extinct.

The story then follows Girl and her family group — Big Mother, Him and Runt — as they struggle to survive in a world that has changed without their knowing it.

Weakened by illness and a bad winter, the family prepares to make a difficult trek to the place of “the fish run,” where other groups gather annually to find mates and food.

But a sudden death forces Girl and Runt into the rocky forest terrain on their own, to search in vain for others. Why has everyone disappeare­d?

Cameron interweave­s the story of Girl’s gripping quest with sections set in present-day France, where archaeolog­ist Rosamund Gale has discovered a gamechangi­ng pair of ancient skeletons that appear to be the remains of a Neandertha­l and a modern human (homo sapiens) entwined in an embrace.

This narrative structure, reminiscen­t of A.S. Byatt’s Possession, allows the author to explore both sides of the timeline: researcher­s tracking clues to learn about a vanished people as well as the adventures of those living in the earlier epoch.

The back-and-forth rhythm, first Girl’s story and then Rosamund’s, develops echoes between the two women, similariti­es in their stories.

When both characters become pregnant and give birth, in tense and affecting scenes of physical exertion, we realize with a sweet shock the fundamenta­l sameness in those primal experience­s — even across thousands of years.

The Last Neandertha­l is most compelling in the chapters where Girl strives to find enough food for her and Runt to stay alive as they search for others, all the while fending off attacks by bear or cougar.

The way these two archaic humans communicat­e, through gestures and few words — aroo,

bearden, pitch — fascinates as well.

But Rosamund’s main conflict, whether the museum funding her dig will override her scientific bias for a glitzy big show, is less interestin­g because the stakes seem much lower in comparison.

It is her thinking process about her discovery and her questions about the entwined skeletons — who were these people? What sorts of lives did they lead? — that create a rich counterpoi­nt to the moment-bymoment story of Girl in the forest.

Modern humans today share up to 4% of the DNA of the archaic species depicted in The Last Neandertha­l.

This vivid and at times melancholy novel makes clear how much we carry on from those who existed long before us.

 ??  ?? DAVID KERR
DAVID KERR
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States