USA TODAY US Edition

Sexism reigns in Silicon Valley

Sexual harassment part of the landscape

- Jessica Guynn and Jon Swartz

When Jen O’Neal was raising money for her travel start-up two years ago, she was invited to pitch to all the partners and associates at a prominent Silicon Valley venture capital firm.

The conference table was huge, and the slides for her presentati­on were projected onto a massive screen. As she began to address the room, she glanced around. Four women, none of them investing partners, were squeezed into small chairs against the side wall.

“I don’t think I fully appreciate­d the expression ‘to have a seat at the table’ until that day,” says O’Neal, CEO of Tripping.com, which crawls the Web for vacation property and homesharin­g listings and has raised $55 million in venture capital.

Yet that’s the reality in Sili- con Valley, where men control the power and the purse: Very few women get a seat on either side of the table.

Industry studies for years have documented the sizable gender gap in funding start-ups. The common explanatio­n for women raising a sliver of the financing essential to the growth of Facebook, Google and Uber is that venture capitalist­s tend to back entreprene­urs who have succeeded before or who fit a certain mold. Think Mark Zuckerberg or Larry Page: young and geeky, white or Asian male, often in jeans and T-shirt, who dreamed up an idea while banging out the code in a dorm room.

In recent weeks, another explanatio­n has emerged: A pattern of suggestive remarks and sexual propositio­ns, casual misogyny, groping and assaults that is too often a part of the capital-raising process for women.

Women have come forward to describe the sexual advances that come with negotiatin­g financing, jobs and partnershi­ps — and re- taliation, such as an abrupt end to the business conversati­on if they rebuff a sexual come-on.

Hanna Aase, founder and CEO of video-profile platform Wonderloop, recalls sessions pitching investors for capital that often resulted in more pick-up lines than term sheets. “The second question I get after ‘What do you do?’ is ‘What do you do for fun?’ ” she says. “The third investor question: ‘Do you like being called Hannah Montana?’ ”

Some women have given up, frustrated by years of pitches that go nowhere or quickly segue into invitation­s for a late-night drink. A small but growing number of women are forming women-only investment networks or raising starter capital in other ways.

With venture capital’s bigmoney bro-culture behavior coming to light, there’s a new fear, mingled with the relief: That, in reaction, male financiers will avoid women founders altogether. There’s talk of some men

following the “Mike Pence rule,” referring to the vice president’s comment years ago that he does not eat alone with any women other than his wife.

Lisa Curtis, founder and CEO of food start-up Kuli Kuli, says she has heard of investors canceling meetings with female founders. “I think that’s the wrong reaction,” Curtis says.

Gaining access to the capital, counsel and contacts they need to turn a big idea into the next big thing is tough enough, women say.

Chrissa McFarlane, founder and CEO of Atlanta-based startup Patientory.com, which uses blockchain to secure digital health records, says when she was trying to raise seed money in Silicon Valley, she was the only African-American woman — and the only African American period — anywhere in sight. She says she’s sure she would have had more luck landing an investment had she been a white or Asian man.

Even as women — and women of color — scale corporate ranks, the number of female investing partners at venture capital firms is shrinking. In 1999, 10% of the partners were women. By 2014, it was 6%. Many top venture capital firms in Silicon Valley don’t have a single female investing partner. And, when they do, many female investors feel so heavily scrutinize­d for taking risks on other women that they limit how frequently they make those investment­s.

That’s a significan­t challenge for women, who are starting their own tech companies in greater numbers even as the funding gap between male- and female-led start-ups keeps widening. Last year, male entreprene­urs received $58.2 billion in venture capital. Women received $1.5 billion, or just 2.5%, according to PitchBook.

None of the most highly valued tech start-ups, called unicorns, has a female chief executive, though studies show that companies with female leadership perform better than those with male leadership. According to venture firm First Round Capital, its investment­s in companies with at least one female founder performed 63% better than the allmale founder teams.

Until recently, bringing home some big returns has insulated venture capital from criticism over the lopsided demographi­cs of investment­s. But being outed for sexist and discrimina­tory behavior is drawing troubling parallels to the “boom-boom room” era of Wall Street in the 1980s and 1990s.

So far, the uproar has prompted the resignatio­ns of two investors who purportedl­y used their positions to make unwanted sexual advances to women. This week, Ignition Partners, a venture firm in Bellevue, Wash., said it asked for a partner’s resignatio­n after a complaint of misconduct.

Several women who are trying to raise money for their start-ups told USA TODAY they are still too fearful of reprisals to publicly complain. But more women are speaking out.

Melinda Epler, founder and CEO of Change Catalyst, a group that promotes diversity in the tech industry, says she scrapped her plans to open an accelerato­r for women-led companies shortly after meeting with a potential investor and diversity ally at a coffee shop.

He moved his hand close to hers, let his knee brush against hers and advised her that male investors would find her attractive and she should say nothing when they spoke to her or touched her in inappropri­ate ways. “Don’t complain, don’t talk about it,” he said. “Because investors talk to each other, you’ll be blackliste­d and you’ll never be able to raise money.”

Some investors and trade groups are exploring ways to stamp out this sort of behavior. LinkedIn founder and venture capitalist Reid Hoffman has called on venture capitalist­s to sign a decency pledge. Sallie Krawcheck, the Wall Street veteran who is now CEO and founder of digital investment platform for women Ellevest, says they should sign a funding pledge instead.

Research shows that women seeking funding are asked very different questions than men (about risks vs. prospects) and are held to higher standards ( judged on what they have already achieved vs. what they have the potential to achieve), both of which affect how much, if any, capital they receive. A study in Sweden found that venture capitalist­s describe male entreprene­urs as “young and promising ” and female entreprene­urs as “young and inexperien­ced.”

If they are pitching a product targeted at women, female founders frequently get told: “I’ll check with my wife.”

It’s still common for women to be mistaken for someone’s assistant and asked to fetch coffee when they arrive to pitch a startup. In 2014, Lisa Wang met with a Silicon Valley venture firm to seek funding for her on-demand, late-night munchies delivery service Fooze. The partners mistook her as the assistant to her chief operating officer, who was an older man.

Eventually Wang decided to ditch her pursuit of venture funding. Fooze was eventually sold to a serial entreprene­ur. Today Wang runs SheWorx, a collective of 20,000 female entreprene­urs trying to close the funding gap.

There’s plenty of risk in maintainin­g status quo for venture capitalist­s as well, warns diversity advocate and venture capitalist Freada Kapor Klein.

With rapidly shifting demographi­cs, neglecting to fund businesses started by women and people of color could significan­tly undercut returns for venture capital firms, she says.

“There are going to be more and more women, more women of color ... who are going to be founders,” Klein says. “Unless (venture capitalist­s) have diversity at the table, they are going to miss out on a huge opportunit­y.”

A story Wednesday about feral cats being used by businesses to control rodents misstated the age of Brittany Sorgenstei­n. She is 31.

 ?? TRIFON ANGUELOV ?? HANNA AASE
TRIFON ANGUELOV HANNA AASE
 ?? GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O ??
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O
 ?? USA TODAY ?? FREADA KAPOR KLEIN
USA TODAY FREADA KAPOR KLEIN
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? KAIT EBINGER ?? LISA WANG
KAIT EBINGER LISA WANG
 ?? JIM STONE ?? JEN O'NEAL
JIM STONE JEN O'NEAL
 ?? KULI KULI ?? LISA CURTIS
KULI KULI LISA CURTIS
 ??  ??
 ?? MICHAEL RUBIN ?? Chrissa McFarlane, founder of start-up Patientory.com, says when she was trying to raise seed money in Silicon Valley, she was the only African-American woman in sight.
MICHAEL RUBIN Chrissa McFarlane, founder of start-up Patientory.com, says when she was trying to raise seed money in Silicon Valley, she was the only African-American woman in sight.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States