USA TODAY US Edition

Sanctions compromise would repudiate Russia, restrict Trump

Under bill, president would need approval to lift penalties

- Oren Dorell @orendorell USA TODAY

“This demonstrat­es that despite the president’s intentions, American policy toward an aggressive Kremlin is becoming stronger.” John Herbst, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and Uzbekistan

The House of Representa­tives plans to pass a compromise bill Tuesday that would toughen sanctions on Russia for its alleged meddling in the 2016 presidenti­al election — and make it harder for President Trump to ease them.

House and Senate negotiator­s reached a bipartisan agreement over the weekend amid growing scrutiny by Congress and a special prosecutor of possible links between Russian officials and the Trump campaign.

Trump objected to the bill’s limits on his ability to lift or ease the sanctions.

The Senate passed an earlier version of the bill 98-2.

“This demonstrat­es that despite the president’s intentions, American policy toward an aggressive Kremlin is becoming stronger,” said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and Uzbekistan, two former Soviet republics.

WHAT IT WOULD DO The bill would punish Russia for meddling in the U.S. presidenti­al elections and for its military aggression in Ukraine and Syria. Russia has not done enough to implement a cease-fire in eastern Ukraine, where Russian-backed separatist­s fight government troops, according to the State Department.

The bill would codify sanctions imposed by President Obama over Russia’s alleged interferen­ce in the presidenti­al election to aid Trump.

The U.S. intelligen­ce community concluded that there was interferen­ce, but Trump complained that the allegation is not backed up by evidence and is promoted by critics to discredit his election.

The sanctions, which primarily target Russian oil and gas projects with companies based in the USA, Germany and other countries, would be harder for Trump to lift because he’d need congressio­nal approval.

WHITE HOUSE REACTION The White House lobbied Congress to kill or soften the bill, especially the mandate requiring a congressio­nal review if the president attempted to ease or end the sanctions.

Those efforts had “zero influ- ence,” said Herbst, an analyst at the Atlantic Council think tank. The reason: “All the questions related to (the Trump camp’s) interactio­ns with the Russians.”

White House spokeswoma­n Sarah Huckabee Sanders told ABC News on Sunday that the White House supports the bill after a few changes “and will continue working with the House and Senate to put those tough sanctions in place on Russia until the situation in Ukraine is fully resolved, and it certainly isn’t right now.”

Trump tweeted his frustratio­n Sunday over the investigat­ion into possible links between his campaign and Russia: “As the phony Russian Witch Hunt continues, two groups are laughing at this excuse for a lost election taking hold, Democrats and Russians!”

IMPACT ON GAS INDUSTRY The bill would target Russian gas pipelines in a way that would hurt Russia’s No. 1 export and Nord Stream 2, a pipeline project to carry Russian gas across the Baltic Sea to Germany. The U.S. natural gas industry, which has begun exporting liquefied natural gas to Europe, stands to benefit from blocking new Russian gas pipelines.

The pipeline’s goal is to bypass Ukraine, where Russia seized territory and supported a separatist movement after Ukraine’s new government sought closer ties with the European Union, Herbst said.

Ukraine, almost completely dependent on Russian gas in 2014, restructur­ed its energy imports and bought no Russian gas last year.

Nord Stream 2 would deprive Ukraine of significan­t transit fees it charges for gas destined for other European destinatio­ns. Belarus and Poland would also be negatively affected by the Russian- German project, Herbst said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who sees the pipeline project as a boon for German industry, expressed her opposition to the sanctions in June.

Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday that Moscow has “an extremely negative view” of the bill because it threatens a number of large-scale projects with European countries.

IMPACT ON RUSSIA POLICY The bill would make it harder for Trump to achieve his goal of improved relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, said Derek Chollet, who helped set European defense policy as an assistant secretary of Defense for internatio­nal security affairs under Obama.

Trump and Putin have spoken about finding ways to cooperate on counterter­rorism and ending Syria’s six-year-long civil war. After the two leaders met at the Group of 20 summit in Hamburg this month, officials from both countries announced a regional cease-fire in Syria.

IMPACT ON RUSSIA Steve Pifer, a U.S. ambassador to Ukraine under President George W. Bush, said the bill is unlikely to have the desired impact on curbing Russian behavior.

Pifer noted that Congress passed the Jackson-Vanik amendment to the Trade Act of 1974, which required congressio­nal approval before the president could remove sanctions on the Soviet Union over its treatment of religious minorities, especially Jews.

The amendment became moot after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, but it took more than a decade to be repealed, then it was replaced by the Magnitzky Act, which punishes Russia over human rights violations and corruption, Pifer said.

“From the Russian perspectiv­e, (the new bill) makes the sanctions much harder to lift, even if the Russians were to meet the goal of the sanctions,” he said. “To the extent it puts pressure on Russia to implement the (Ukraine cease-fire) agreement, Russians in Moscow might say ‘ Why bother?’ ”

 ?? EVAN VUCCI, AP ?? President Trump speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit July 7 in Hamburg. Trump wants more cooperatio­n with Russia on counterter­rorism.
EVAN VUCCI, AP President Trump speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G-20 summit July 7 in Hamburg. Trump wants more cooperatio­n with Russia on counterter­rorism.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States