USA TODAY US Edition

Trump’s weakness for instant gratificat­ion

- Jill Lawrence Jill Lawrence is commentary editor of USA TODAY and author of The Art of the Political Deal: How Congress Beat the Odds and Broke Through Gridlock.

Chess vs. checkers is standard shorthand for suggesting a president is either smart, or not. President Trump’s forte is the simpler game without all the strategic forethough­t. Who could have guessed that would be the wrong game for a president.

The consequenc­es have run a narrow gamut from bad to disastrous. With Charlottes­ville, Va., his impulsive short-termism now threatens the values, identity and character, indeed the very exceptiona­lism, of a nation.

Whether it’s our heritage or our economy, peering around corners is not something Trump does. His quick end to U.S. participat­ion in the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnershi­p, covering 40% of the world economy, fulfilled a campaign pledge. But he abandoned it without an alternate plan in place for trade.

Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey was checkers writ gigantic. It was inevitable that someone, a special counsel or a conscience-stricken congressio­nal committee, would continue the Russia investigat­ion. So why take a chance it would fall into the hands of a highly accomplish­ed special counsel like, say, former FBI director Robert Mueller?

The escalating feud with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell — like Trump, a Republican — is another mystery explained only by the checkers analogy. Do you really want to offend and anger the senator who would be key to impeaching you? And that’s just the tip of the Congress iceberg. Trump has publicly insulted or pressured countless senators and House members of his own party, setting the stage for them to feel less than loyal.

Trump’s latest less than logical indulgence­s are cozying up to his white nationalis­t supporters after their “Unite the Right” show of force in Charlottes­ville — and then firing their man in the White House, chief strategist Steve Bannon. He was either unaware or uncaring that his embrace of the white supremacis­t crowd would alienate so many and provoke mass desertions by the business community. Firing Bannon won’t turn back that clock. All it will do is enrage one of Trump’s last pillars of support. This is not chess.

Of course, the most egregious act of checkers was Trump’s presidenti­al candidacy itself. It’s clear he did not think through what might happen if he won.

Why does Trump insist on playing the short game? Perhaps it’s because Trump has never paid a real price for his reckless pursuit of instant gratificat­ion. It’s not for lack of attempts by others to make him pay — women who say he attacked them; customers and business associates he allegedly cheated; and Hillary Clinton, who had Trump’s number and said so throughout the 2016 campaign. Instead, he has been rewarded all his life with business success, beautiful wives and, now, the presidency.

The stakes are infinitely higher now, but Trump might finally face accountabi­lity. He could finally recognize that he should have been playing chess.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States