USA TODAY US Edition

54 years after ‘Dream’ speech, voting rights still under assault

-

As the 2018 and 2020 elections approach, federal and state officials ought to be scrambling for ways to prevent a repeat of Russian interferen­ce or other meddling in American democracy.

Instead, many are on an obsessive hunt to eradicate phantom problems, such as supposedly massive fraud by non-citizens and people voting in two states. The upshot is that 54 years after Martin Luther King appealed for voting rights in his “I Have a Dream” speech, those rights remain under assault:

Restrictiv­e laws approved by Republican legislatur­es have targeted minorities and poor people by, among other things, demanding specific forms of identifica­tion that few have. A federal appeals court overturned North Carolina’s law, finding that it targeted African Americans “with almost surgical precision.” Last week in Texas, a federal judge ruled that the state’s voter ID law is discrimina­tory and illegal.

A Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, created in May, seems focused on the president’s absurd claim that he lost the popular vote only because as many as 5 million illegal votes were cast. Never mind that the president’s own lawyers previously argued against a recount in Michigan, stating in a court filing: “All available evidence suggests that the 2016 gen- eral election was not tainted by fraud or mistake.”

Certainly, easily obtainable IDs are a good way to ensure that voters are valid. And any fraudulent voting should be investigat­ed and prosecuted. But instances of such fraud are rare. Voter fraud shouldn’t be confused with the millions of people who move, fail to notify election officials at their old address and end up registered in two places. Others divide their time between homes in different states and are registered in both. But few try to use either circumstan­ce to vote twice.

Despite that, some states have purged thousands of voters in legally dubious moves. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Ohio’s purge of voters whose only sins were failing to vote for six years and not responding to notice that they might be removed from the registrati­on rolls. The case is now heading to the Supreme Court.

Last October, a federal panel in the 10th Circuit blocked the Kansas law, which required people registerin­g at motor vehicle offices to document their citizenshi­p — a mandate that violates federal law.

Appeals Judge Jerome Holmes, a George W. Bush appointee, wrote that Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who championed the measure, has “shown only three cases of noncitizen­s actually voting.” Yet the state denied more than 18,000 citizens the right to vote. That, the court found, is “mass denial of a fundamenta­l constituti­onal right.”

Who does Trump pick to cochair his commission? Kris Kobach. That decision tainted the commission from the start.

All this overblown talk of voter fraud shakes people’s confidence in democratic elections. In a nation where four in 10 eligible voters did not vote in 2016, the government should be working to get more people to vote, not to find ways to turn voters away.

 ?? CHIP SOMODEVILL­A, GETTY IMAGES ?? Students reciting “I Have a Dream” last year.
CHIP SOMODEVILL­A, GETTY IMAGES Students reciting “I Have a Dream” last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States