USA TODAY US Edition

Harvard courts clickbait instead of excellence

- Kathy Kiely Kathy Kiely, who spent four decades covering politics in Washington, teaches journalism at the University of New Hampshire and is this year’s National Press Club Journalism Institute Press Freedom fellow.

Who says Harvard is a bastion of the intellectu­al elite? Just like the rest of us, the blue chippiest of American educationa­l institutio­ns is a sucker for clickbait.

There’s no other way to explain the excruciati­ngly embarrassi­ng contretemp­s over an eye-poppingly odd couple of fellows named by the university’s prestigiou­s Institute of Politics: former White House spokesman Sean Spicer and formerly imprisoned whistle-blower Chelsea Manning.

As the geniuses who dreamed up this pairing undoubtedl­y intended, the news earned Harvard buzzy headlines. Then came the blowback from partisans on the right, who see Manning as a traitor. Harvard ungallantl­y pulled the crimson carpet out from under Manning ’s feet. Now there’s the inevitable noise from the left.

If a former Army intelligen­ce specialist is considered unworthy for violating public trust, Manning supporters wonder, why is Harvard having no second thoughts about Spicer, who hollered when journalist­s wouldn’t report untrue crowd sizes? It doesn’t help that the institute had earlier named Corey Lewandowsk­i, another former Trump spokespers­on, as a fellow. He had distinguis­hed himself by manhandlin­g a female reporter.

I leave it to others to ponder how either Trump mouthpiece embodies veritas, the Latin word for truth on the Harvard seal. Far more disturbing is what this says about a culture that Harvard is supposed to embody.

As a longtime journalist and now a member of a college faculty, I’m all for the First Amend- ment and academic freedom. I have no problem with Harvard inviting Spicer, Lewandowsk­i or Manning to speak and answer questions. But a fellowship is something different: It’s an honor, a seal of academic approval. It provides a berth for doing research and speaking out. In the cases at hand, it is also a means of laundering a résumé.

Harvard could have found much more deserving people to celebrate. One is Martin Mendez, a young Mexican journalist who returned home under the threat of death rather than waste away in deplorable detention facilities while U.S. authoritie­s dragged their feet over an asylum request that they admit was legitimate. Or how about John Tye, a State Department whistle-blower who is starting an organizati­on to help others avoid the massive legal fees his principles cost him?

Problem is, courageous journalist­s and principled public servants aren’t trending on Twitter.

Academe should be our last bastion of unadultera­ted excellence, the one place where you’d hope to find decision-makers with enough perspectiv­e and intellectu­al integrity to be immune from buzz lust. But, no. In an era when anybody can build a following on social media, its tinsel sparkle seems to have more appeal for Harvard than the sheen of sterling. To quote a certain public figure who knows a thing or two about social media and what it takes to trend on it: Sad.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States