USA TODAY US Edition

HEALTH COSTS IN EARLY RETIREMENT CAN DING YOU

Premiums keep going up for many using insurance exchanges

- Steven Findlay Kaiser Health News Kaiser Health News, a non-profit health newsroom whose stories appear in news outlets nationwide, is an editoriall­y independen­t part of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Don and Debra Clark of Springfiel­d, Mo., are glad they have health insurance. Don is 56, and Debra is 58. The Clarks say they know the risk of an unexpected illness or medical event is rising as they age.

Don is retired, and Debra works part time a couple of days a week. As a result, along with

20 million other Americans, they buy health insurance on the individual market — the one significan­tly altered by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

But the Clarks are not happy at all with what they pay for their coverage — $1,400 a month for a plan with a $4,500 deductible. Nor are they looking forward to open enrollment this fall. They must choose a new plan because their current insurer is dropping theirs.

“This has become a nightmare,” said Don Clark. “We are now spending about 30% of our income on health insurance and health care. We did not plan for that.”

Karen Steininger, 62, of Altoona, Iowa, said her ACA coverage not only gave her peace of mind but also helped her and her husband, who is now on Medicare, stay in business the past few years. But they, too, are concerned about rising costs.

The Steininger­s are self-employed owners of a pottery studio. Their income varies year to year. They now pay $245 a month for Karen’s subsidized coverage, which has a $4,500 deductible. Without the government subsidy, the premium would be about

$700 a month.

“What if we make more money and get less of a subsidy or just if the premiums increase a lot?” Karen Steininger asked. “That would be a burden.”

Her premium subsidy is separate from a program also offered under the health law that helps very low-income people pay for out-of-pocket expenses. Those cost-sharing subsidies are what President Trump announced late Thursday that he is dropping.

BACK TO THE DAYS OF ‘JOB LOCK’?

The experience­s of the Clarks and the Steininger­s illustrate how the ACA’s promise of easier access to affordable health insurance for people who retire early and the self-employed is under threat. Also at risk: a reduction in “job lock.”

In the run-up to the law’s passage in 2010, then-President Obama spoke often of older workers hanging onto jobs they no longer wanted just to keep their health insurance.

Before the ACA, 1 in 4 55- to 64-year-olds either couldn’t get coverage at all or could not afford it, according to AARP. Insurers were allowed to deny people coverage outright and charge people over age 55 five to 10 times more than a younger person.

The ACA restricts that to three times more and bars insurers from charging people with pre-existing conditions more.

Trends in employer-sponsored retiree coverage added to job lock. Only 1 in 4 companies with 200 or more workers offered coverage to early (pre-65) retirees in

2017 compared with 66% of firms in 1988, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. (Kaiser Health News is an editoriall­y independen­t program of the foundation.)

“The aging but pre-Medicare population was our major reason to support the ACA then, and it still is now,” said David Certner, director of legislativ­e policy at AARP.

Policy experts say the lingering effects of the 2008-09 recession, plus other economic and social forces, make it difficult to say with certainty just how many 55to 64-years-olds were liberated from job lock by the ACA.

Data also show substantia­l benefits of the law to the self-employed in this age group. For example, 18% of people ages 55 to

64 who were still working in 2015 got coverage through the ACA marketplac­es, up from 11.6% in

2013, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data by the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

PREMIUM INCREASES ARE LOOKING OMINOUS

But today’s retirees and selfemploy­ed business owners find themselves especially vulnerable to rising premiums, high out-ofpocket costs and insurer turnover associated with coverage in the individual market.

“These are the people in their late 50s or early 60s who don’t qualify for government subsidies because their incomes are too high, they retire early or have their own businesses,” said Kevin Lucia, a health insurance specialist and research professor at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. “They are also more likely to have pre-existing conditions and thus high expenses.”

Open enrollment in the individual health insurance market begins Nov. 1.

Premiums rose an average 22% nationwide in 2017. Some states saw premiums rise 35% or more. In addition, deductible­s and outof-pocket costs increased, too, and many more people switched to plans with deductible­s of $4,000 or higher to keep monthly premiums manageable.

In some states, premium increases for 2018 are, indeed, looking ominous. In Florida, for example, regulators announced late last month that rates in the ACA exchange in that state could increase by an average 44.7%. In Indiana, officials said increases would range from 20% to 48.3% for the three insurers serving the individual market.

The danger is that such increases, two years in a row, will lead fewer people to buy coverage.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ??
GETTY IMAGES
 ??  ?? Karen Steininger
Karen Steininger

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States