USA TODAY US Edition

Immigrant crime hotline released callers’ info

- Daniel González

PHOENIX – The same week the Trump administra­tion opened a hotline in April to support victims of crimes by immigrants, Elena Maria Lopez called to report a complaint against her ex-husband.

At first, Lopez kept getting a busy signal.

Finally someone answered. For the next 20 minutes, Lopez provided a detailed account, accusing a Dutch immigrant of marrying her to get a green card, then threatenin­g to harm her if she contacted immigratio­n officials.

What happened next shocked Lopez. Not only did Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, the agency that operates the hotline, decline to take action, but immigratio­n authoritie­s also released much of the private informatio­n she provided.

This included a confidenti­al Internet phone number she fears will make it easier for anyone to locate her in New Jersey, where she has a protected address set up for domestic-violence victims.

Lopez is one of hundreds of people whose private informatio­n was inappropri­ately released by ICE when the agency posted call logs to the hotline on its website, a violation of the agency’s own policies against divulging private informatio­n, as well as privacy laws intended to protect individual­s who provide sensitive informatio­n to the government.

The agency released some of the same informatio­n to The Arizona Re

public, part of the USA TODAY NETWORK, in response to a Freedom of Informatio­n Act request.

Lopez contacted the newspaper after ICE officials notified her through telephone calls and emails that private informatio­n she provided in confidence was inadverten­tly released to the newspaper.

“I was very upset because I do my best to protect my privacy for my safety, and I was especially upset that it was the Department of Homeland Security that gave out my personal informatio­n,” she said. “The same agency that claimed it had to protect my ex-husband’s rights just destroyed my privacy and my safety.” ‘This is a serious problem’

The agency’s release of private informatio­n underscore­s problems that have surfaced since ICE launched the Victims of Immigratio­n Crime Engagement office, or VOICE, to “serve the needs of crime victims and their families who have been affected by crimes committed by individual­s with a nexus to immigratio­n.”

The office includes a telephone hotline that was intended to “answer questions from victims,” according to the VOICE website.

Instead, callers have treated it as a crime hotline, using it largely to accuse people of being in the country illegally or of violating immigratio­n laws, according to telephone logs the agency released The Republic.

“This is a serious problem and obviously will further discourage people from attempting to interact in any way with the federal government on immigratio­n matters,” said immigratio­n policy analyst David Bier at the Cato Institute, a libertaria­n think tank.

Victims and witnesses of crimes are hesitant to provide informatio­n to the government because “having that infor- mation out in the public could pose a serious threat to them and to their family,” he said.

President Trump called for the creation of the VOICE program in an executive order on immigratio­n in January 2016, which directed the Department of Homeland Security and ICE to take a tougher stance on illegal immigratio­n and immigratio­n law violators.

In a written statement, ICE officials admitted that the agency erred in divulging private informatio­n “protected by policy and law.”

“When the agency receives evidence suggesting that non-releasable informatio­n is unintentio­nally available, immediate actions are taken to ensure proper mitigation both to correct and to prevent further disclosure­s,” the statement said.

Those actions include temporaril­y removing and reviewing the entire contents of ICE’s Freedom of Informatio­n Act library, the statement said. The library contained thousands of pages of data and documents the agency had released in response to requests.

The contents of ICE’s Freedom of Informatio­n Act library were restored Oct. 16, the agency said.

The agency offered identity-threat monitoring services to people affected because of the improper disclosure of private informatio­n, the statement said.

Lopez said ICE offered her two years of identity-theft protection and credit monitoring.

“That does nothing for me,” she said. Lopez said she became hopeful when Trump said he was creating the VOICE office.

For more a decade, she said, she has tried unsuccessf­ully to get immigratio­n authoritie­s to investigat­e her ex-husband, Erik Niehof, a Dutch immigrant.

He disputes her allegation­s accusing him of marriage fraud and domestic violence. “Basically, this was just a marriage that ended up really bad, and ‘I am going to get back at you, and I am going to do that through immigratio­n service,’ ” Niehof said. “This is her vengeance.”

In 2016, Niehof said, U.S. immigratio­n officers briefly detained him when he returned from a vacation abroad after his immigratio­n record was flagged because of his ex-wife’s allegation­s. While he waited, immigratio­n officers looked into his record, then welcomed him back into the USA. He said that would not have happened if any of Lopez’s allegation­s were true.

“That is probably why (immigratio­n authoritie­s) haven’t made a case of this, because there is no validity in any of it,” he said. “She is out for vengeance.”

Motives questioned

Bier of the Cato Institute said he supports government efforts to provide more informatio­n about cases to crime victims, as well as informing them of other services available.

But the program’s problems and its narrow focus on victims of crimes committed by immigrants suggests the program has ulterior motives, he said.

“The administra­tion says the motive of the program is to provide more informatio­n to crime victims,” Bier said. “I think if that was the case, it would apply to all crime victims, not just crime victims of immigrants. So I think the motivation is the effort to portray unauthoriz­ed immigrants, and immigrants more generally, as a threat or a potential threat to Americans rather than to actually provide meaningful aid to victims of crimes.”

 ?? GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O ??
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States