USA TODAY US Edition

Trump infrastruc­ture proposal offers a road forward

-

Anyone who has spent hours in traffic, or been embarrasse­d by how aging U.S. infrastruc­ture systems stack up against modern ones abroad, knows that America is doing palpable harm by not maintainin­g, let alone expanding, its roads and rails.

So what to make of the long-awaited $1.5 trillion infrastruc­ture plan that President Trump released Monday?

The first conclusion is that Trump should have made this his first order of business, rather than an effort to strip health coverage for millions of Americans or to push through tax cuts focused on the wealthy.

The second is that he doesn’t really have a $1.5 trillion plan. He has a plan that would spend $200 billion in federal money over 10 years, with the remainder coming from states and businesses — which is to say from higher state taxes, tolls and user fees.

But a third thing to say is this: It’s not such a crazy idea.

To be sure, the 55-page Trump plan is in some ways a cop-out, recognizin­g the need for politicall­y difficult revenue increases and then telling the states to do the heavy lifting.

Even so, it would at least push transporta­tion in the direction it needs to go. It would speed up the maddening delays and endless reviews that often stand in the way of new projects. Road improvemen­ts would be funded largely by the people who benefit from them and according to business principles.

To see the value of this approach, consider the difference between America’s highways and airports. Roads are often underfunde­d, overused and in ill repair. But with some notable exceptions, such as New York LaGuardia, airports do a decent job of keeping up.

They do this by maximizing their revenue from gate fees, parking and retail leases, then working with airlines and other stakeholde­rs to plow money back into upgrades and expansions.

Imagine if roads were funded the same way.

This might start by bringing the federal gasoline tax at least back to where it was 25 years ago. The 18.4-cent a gallon tax was not indexed when it was set in 1993, so it has effectivel­y been cut almost in half by inflation.

Ultimately, a better system would involve wider use of smart tolls that rise and fall depending on traffic volume. Trump’s plan would give states more flexibilit­y to impose such tolls.

A system like that would produce hundreds of billions of dollars each decade that could be used to repair, upgrade and expand the nation’s roads. Some of it could be diverted to mass transit to alleviate road congestion and provide options for those without cars.

This is not a hugely popular idea. But the more time Americans spend parked on America’s highways, the more they should think about alternativ­e ways to maintain them.

And that might start by not dismissing Trump’s concepts out of hand. Say what you will about the president, he has a track record of knowing how to get stuff built.

 ??  ?? DAVID GOLDMAN, AP
DAVID GOLDMAN, AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States