USA TODAY US Edition

Supreme Court arguments get intense in union fee dispute

- Richard Wolf

Given his conservati­ve bona fides, Justice Neil Gorsuch is likely to tip the balance against the unions. That would upend the fees paid by police, firefighte­rs, teachers and other government workers who don’t join unions that represent them.

Justice who probably has deciding vote stays silent

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court staged an animated, at times angry, debate Monday in a challenge to public employee labor unions that threatens their membership, financing and political power.

In a repeat performanc­e of oral arguments held three times in the past six years, the court’s liberals decried efforts to eliminate “fair share” fees from non-members in 23 states while its conservati­ves raged about forcing objectors to support most of the unions’ activities.

“When you compel somebody to speak, don’t you infringe that person’s dignity and conscience?” said Justice Samuel Alito, the leader of the conservati­ve wing on labor union issues.

The key justice remained silent. Because of the vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death, the court was divided 4-4 two years ago in an almost identical case. Scalia’s successor, Justice Neil Gorsuch, probably will have the deciding vote in this case. And he wasn’t talking.

Given his conservati­ve bona fides, President Trump’s lone nominee is likely to tip the balance against the unions. That would upend the fees paid by police, firefighte­rs, teachers and other government workers who don’t join unions that represent them.

After three cases in 2012, 2014 and 2016, the high court appears poised to reverse its own 40-year-old precedent and strike down the fees as unconstitu­tional. The ruling in 1977 said workers did not have to pay for unions’ political activity. The verdict in this case, which is likely by June, would allow them to contribute nothing for collective bargaining and grievance procedures, as well.

If the court’s five conservati­ves vote the way both sides anticipate, public employee unions in traditiona­lly Democratic states in the Northeast and West will lose those workers and the fees they pay. Other lawsuits could follow if workers are allowed to band together and seek refunds for fees already paid.

On top of that, unions are braced for a slow bleed of full-dues-paying members. Until now, those workers could save only about 10% to 20% of their costs by quitting the union. A ruling against fair-share fees would enable them to become “free riders.” That could force unions to raise dues on those who remain — or lose clout in states such as California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvan­ia and New Jersey.

When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that unions could be drained of the resources needed to negotiate with state and local government­s, William Messenger, the lawyer for Illinois state worker Mark Janus, said, “That’s a perfectly acceptable result.”

When Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan pushed back on the argument that everything a public sector union bargains for affects public policy, U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco said, “All of it goes to the size, structure, cost of government.”

The case, Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal

Employees, is backed by conservati­ve groups that have tried for years to overturn the court’s decision upholding the fees for collective bargaining but not for political action.

The court ruled 7-2, 5-4 and 4-4 on three similar cases in the past six years, eating away at the 1977 decision without overruling it entirely. In 2016, Scalia’s death a month after oral arguments denied conservati­ves their fifth vote — a vote Gorsuch probably will provide.

Less assured is the impact such a ruling would have on organized labor in general, and public employee unions in particular. After a 70-year decline in union membership, the consensus is for more of the same.

“You’re basically arguing, ‘ Do away with unions,’ ” Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Messenger near the end of the hour-long debate.

The nation’s roughly 15 million union members make up less than 11% of the workforce, a drop from 35% during World War II. The decline has been fueled in the private sector, where only 6.5% of workers remain unionized.

 ??  ?? Activists rally outside the Supreme Court as it debated. ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES
Activists rally outside the Supreme Court as it debated. ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States