USA TODAY US Edition

Sessions condemns ‘judicial superiorit­y’

Courts’ resistance to immigratio­n policy ‘maddening’

- Kevin Johnson Contributi­ng: Richard Wolf

WASHINGTON – Attorney General Jeff Sessions offered a harsh rebuke of the judiciary Tuesday, asserting that a barrage of court decisions that effectivel­y blocked key parts of the Trump administra­tion’s immigratio­n policies smack of “judicial superiorit­y.”

Citing at least 20 adverse rulings in the past year — from stalling President Trump’s travel ban to blocking an effort to end protection­s for undocument­ed immigrants brought to the country as children — Sessions said the decisions threatened to upend the guiding principle of the judiciary as an equal branch of the government.

“We’re not acting irrational­ly or emotionall­y,” Sessions told a gathering of the National Associatio­n of Attorneys General.

The attorney general specifical­ly referred to the Supreme Court refusal Monday to review an order that the Trump administra­tion continue a program protecting undocument­ed immigrants brought to the USA as children.

The denial leaves in place the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which has protected about 690,000 undocument­ed immigrants from deportatio­n and enabled them to get work permits.

The program faced a deadline of March 5 for congressio­nal action set by Trump last summer. Two federal courts ruled the administra­tion’s action was illegal.

The Supreme Court justices could have agreed to hear the case this spring, leapfroggi­ng a federal appeals court based in California that has been sympatheti­c to the cause of immigrants. They could have overruled federal District Judge William Alsup without a hearing. Instead, they simply allowed the case to run its normal course through the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. “It is assumed that the Court of Appeals will proceed expeditiou­sly to decide this case,” the justices said. The case still could come to the high court.

The action represents a temporary victory for the young adults brought to the USA illegally by their parents or guardians but sheltered under the DACA policy establishe­d by President Obama in 2012. The Trump administra­tion vowed to continue the legal battle in the lower courts.

Sessions called the tangle of court rulings “maddening.”

The attorney general reasserted the administra­tion’s support for hard-line policies against so-called sanctuary cities. “Sanctuary cities” is a general term that describes more than 300 government­s that have limited their cooperatio­n with federal immigratio­n officials. Trump attacked them repeatedly during his presidenti­al campaign, arguing that leaders allowed dangerous undocument­ed immigrants to roam free in their communitie­s.

The communitie­s argued that immigratio­n enforcemen­t is a federal responsibi­lity and that the U.S. Constituti­on prohibits Washington from forcing them to assist. Many states led by Republican­s follow Trump’s lead.

Sessions said Tuesday that the cities’ position has been “deeply frustratin­g.”

“We’re not acting irrational­ly or emotionall­y.”

Jeff Sessions Attorney general

 ??  ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions judges the judiciary. ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES
Attorney General Jeff Sessions judges the judiciary. ALEX WONG/GETTY IMAGES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States