USA TODAY US Edition

Under fire, Sessions silent no longer

Former attorneys general back him up as he faces Trump’s renewed wrath

- Kevin Johnson and David Jackson

WASHINGTON – Attorney General Jeff Sessions absorbed every taunt and Twitter bomb lobbed his way by a displeased boss.

Like so many political rivals he dispatched during a scorched-earth campaign for the White House, President Trump publicly shamed his attorney general as weak or beleaguere­d.

Sessions, one of the president’s earliest and most vocal supporters, largely sat silent — until now.

Sessions quickly responded Wednesday to Trump’s latest Twitter lashing, in which he called the attorney general “disgracefu­l” for choosing the Justice Department’s inspector general instead of prosecutor­s to review alleged surveillan­ce abuses against a former Trump campaign aide.

“As long as I am the attorney general,” Sessions said Wednesday, “I will continue to discharge my duties with integrity and honor.”

Two former attorneys general rallied to Sessions’ defense Thursday, including Edwin Meese who said Trump’s treatment of the former Alabama senator has been unfair and probably unpreceden­ted.

“I know it’s not always his way to respond (to the president), but it was important for Jeff to stand behind the (Justice Department) when it is doing the right thing,” said Meese, who served in the Reagan administra­tion.

Meese said Trump’s attorney general has done more to “further the president’s agenda than anybody” on immigratio­n enforcemen­t, combating violent crime and opioid abuse.

“I can’t explain it,” Meese said of the president’s criticism.

William “Bill” Barr, an attorney general to President George H.W. Bush, said it was important for the public to hear from Sessions in the wake of Trump’s latest criticism.

“I think he was reminding the American people of a key attribute that we need in an attorney general, and that is integrity,” Barr said. “He’s saying, ‘Look, I’m calling things as I see it.’ ”

White House spokeswoma­n Sarah Sanders said Thursday that the president stood by his criticism of Sessions.

“The president made his frustratio­n very clear,” Sanders said.

Asked whether Trump planned to dismiss his attorney general, Sanders said, “Not that I know of.”

Trump’s most pointed criticism of Sessions since last spring and summer is fraught with risk. The president’s alliance with his attorney general was damaged a year ago after Sessions recused himself from managing the inquiry into Russia’s alleged interferen­ce in the 2016 election, leading to the appointmen­t of special counsel Robert Mueller.

Any move to oust Sessions could be viewed as an attempt to wrest control of Mueller’s wide-ranging inquiry, which includes looking into whether the president has sought to obstruct the investigat­ion.

“If Trump removes Sessions, Mueller would have to look at this very carefully in combinatio­n with the president’s dismissal of (FBI director James) Comey as an effort to damage, derail or slow down the Russia investigat­ion,” said Patrick Cotter, a former federal prosecutor.

Trump was so angry with Sessions’ recusal last year that the attorney general offered his resignatio­n, which the president did not accept.

“In the (May) interview with NBC, he acknowledg­ed firing Comey because of his handling of the Russia investigat­ion. Whatever Trump does, it seems to make it easier for prosecutor­s,” Cotter said.

The political costs of removing Sessions could be just as risky.

The attorney general enjoys fairly strong support among Republican­s for aggressive­ly pursuing Trump’s agenda at the Justice Department.

In addition to focusing attention on recent spikes in homicide, he has ordered a sweeping review of police agreements that punished troubled agencies; rolled back a series of Obama-era civil rights actions, including a Justice Department challenge to a controvers­ial voter identifica­tion law in Texas; and threatened so-called sanctuary cities for harboring undocument­ed immigrants.

In January, the attorney general paved the way for tougher marijuana enforcemen­t when he rescinded the previous administra­tion’s policy of non-interferen­ce with state laws allowing the use of medical and recreation­al pot.

This week, Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., citing Sessions’ loyalty, said the president should refrain from publicly rebuking the attorney general. “Jeff Sessions is loyal to the president, and he’s one of the first to support him,” King said on Fox News. “He’s often in very difficult positions, and I think he’s trying to reconcile as best as he can.”

But Republican support is not unanimous.

House Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows of North Carolina and Jim Jordan of Ohio called for the attorney general to step down. The congressme­n, citing Sessions’ recusal from the Russia inquiry, asserted that the attorney general can no longer adequately manage the department and the FBI.

Trump’s attacks on Sessions and the possible implicatio­ns for the Russia investigat­ion spawned some unlikely alliances as some Democrats urged Sessions to remain.

In January, Sen. Charles Schumer, DN.Y., who voted against Sessions’ confirmati­on, said the attorney general should not resign.

“Nothing, nothing should ever interfere with the Mueller investigat­ion,” he said.

Sessions draws inspiratio­n and encouragem­ent from some of the men whose portraits hang in his fifth-floor conference room at the Justice Department.

One of them, Meese, said he spoke to the attorney general recently and urged him to carry on.

“I was impressed,” Meese said. “He was in good spirits. I told him he was doing a great job.”

Sessions “was reminding the American people of a key attribute that we need in an attorney general, and that is integrity.” William “Bill” Barr Attorney general to President George H.W. Bush

 ?? WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY IMAGES ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions was called “disgracefu­l” by President Trump for the way he wants to handle a surveillan­ce inquiry.
WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY IMAGES Attorney General Jeff Sessions was called “disgracefu­l” by President Trump for the way he wants to handle a surveillan­ce inquiry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States