USA TODAY US Edition

EPA to ease fuel-economy standards for cars, trucks

- Todd Spangler and Eric D. Lawrence

WASHINGTON – The Trump administra­tion on Monday announced that it would revise tough mileage-per-gallon fuel standards for cars and light trucks, saying the rules agreed to during President Obama’s time in office were “not appropriat­e.”

“The Obama administra­tion’s determinat­ion was wrong,” said Scott Pruitt, head of the Environmen­tal Protection Agency. “Obama’s EPA cut the midterm evaluation process short with politicall­y charged expediency, made assumption­s about the standards that didn’t comport with reality and set the standards too high.”

Pruitt did not say when new standards would be set.

The decision, while expected, means several states, led by California, will likely press courts to allow them to keep tougher standards in place, which could force automakers to produce different cars for sale in different areas.

Meanwhile, environmen­talists argue that any rollback will hurt human health and exacerbate climate change.

“The Trump administra­tion’s decision will take America backward by jeopardizi­ng successful safeguards that are working to clean our air, save drivers money at the pump and drive technologi­cal innovation that creates jobs,” said Luke Tonachel, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Clean Vehicles and Fuels Project. “The American public overwhelmi­ngly supports strong vehicle standards.”

Automakers, on the other hand, said the EPA’s ruling was the right one in order to keep vehicles affordable and let business — not bureaucrat­s — take the lead in determinin­g how best to increase fuel econ- omy standards while protecting their bottom line.

“This was the right decision, and we support the administra­tion for pursuing a datadriven effort and a single national program as it works to finalize future standards,” said Gloria Bergquist, a vice president for the Alliance of Automobile Manufactur­ers, a trade group that represents General Motors, Ford, Fiat Chrysler and others.

To “ensure ongoing fuel economy improvemen­t, the wisest course of action is to keep new vehicles affordable so more consumers can replace an older car with a new vehicle that uses much less fuel — and offers more safety features,” Bergquist said.

Bergquist said that it is critical to maintain a “single national” standard for vehicles and will work with environmen­talists, California officials and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administra­tion to attempt to do so.

But there is no guarantee such an effort will succeed. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra last year filed a lawsuit along with other states in an attempt to force the Trump administra­tion to meet the tougher standards.

Automakers, state officials, environmen­talists and federal regulators had agreed in 2012 to increase fuel efficiency standards to average 34.5 mpg by 2016 across the fleet of American cars and trucks with the figure then to grow to 54.5 mpg by 2025.

But that process called for a so-called midterm review, during which time automakers and others wanted the greater number to be revisited. Before Obama left office in early 2017, the EPA issued a ruling keeping the higher number in place — a decision that President Trump made clear last year he intended to revisit.

Pruitt said Monday that his agency’s new midterm evaluation determined that the standards needed to be revised, though he didn’t make any suggestion­s as to what would be an appropriat­e new standard.

Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA sets national standards for vehicle tailpipe emissions of certain pollutants, though California long has had a waiver to impose tougher standards. The EPA said it was reviewing California’s waiver as well.

 ?? JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES ?? Lowering the mileage-per-gallon standards means some drivers will pay more at the pump.
JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES Lowering the mileage-per-gallon standards means some drivers will pay more at the pump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States