USA TODAY US Edition

Improve standards for self-driving cars

Ariz. accident stresses need for federal clarity

- Mark Rosenker and Amitai Bin-Nun

The accident in Arizona where an Uber self-driving car killed a pedestrian highlights ethical questions that companies face as they develop selfdrivin­g cars in an environmen­t that lacks a detailed federal framework.

When considered as part of a broader suite of technologi­es and policies, self-driving cars hold enormous potential to significan­tly reduce the estimated 100 daily and 40,000 annual fatalities on U.S. roadways — a death rate of epidemic proportion­s.

Yet to fully deploy this life-saving technology will require extensive testing on public roads. At the same time, it also means allowing testing and deployment of these technologi­es as they are being developed and fine-tuned.

This dilemma is compounded by the lack of clarity about when a self-driving car is safe enough to be on public roadways. While the federal government has the appropriat­e authority to investigat­e this crash and recall vehicles, limitation­s mean even a poorly programmed, self-driving car can be deemed roadworthy by the current regulatory framework, because it doesn’t specify safety performanc­e requiremen­ts for autonomous operation.

The lack of a foundation leaves companies to individual­ly grapple with the difficult question of how safe is safe enough? This decision could — and should — be made by the government in consultati­on with industry and other experts. Legislatio­n before Congress would force an accelerate­d process for creating standards for self-driving vehicles and technologi­es.

The risk of premature deployment is well-understood: Public welfare is harmed by the deployment of unsafe technology. However, delayed deployment would deprive society of the improved safety benefits. Without guidance, companies will inevitably err both in being too aggressive and deploying prematurel­y, or in being too cautious and continuing to privately develop the technology even once it is safe enough to benefit the public.

Last year, we served on a commis- sion organized by Securing America’s Future Energy (SAFE) that urged developers to commit, even before comprehens­ive regulation­s are written, to only testing or deploying self-driving cars that would enhance safety. The fundamenta­l truth is that self-driving cars only need to be better than today’s imperfect drivers for the public to benefit. It is important to manage public expectatio­ns on this front.

If companies committed to only deploying self-driving cars once they can responsibl­y represent them as “safer than the average human driver,” they would always represent a net benefit to the public. Acceptance of self-driving cars is a reasonable and prudent risk of which the benefits will outweigh risks in the long term. Only transparen­cy, accountabi­lity and other actions that improve roadway safety will clearly communicat­e that to the public.

Few in the the industry or government would argue with assertions that it is still too early in the developmen­t of self-driving technology to create comprehens­ive and enforceabl­e regulation­s immediatel­y. That is why the pending legislatio­n would create the necessary set of interim regulation­s that would require developers to be more transparen­t about their safety efforts, philosophy and performanc­e.

It is telling that this industry is nearly universall­y supportive of the legislativ­e effort even though it would significan­tly increase regulatory burdens on autonomous vehicle developers.

Every life lost on American roadways is unnecessar­y, and a thorough investigat­ion of the Uber crash will offer important lessons to improve the safety of self-driving cars. In the meantime, the industry, stakeholde­rs and the federal government must work together to set transparen­t, ethical safety standards that are essential for protecting the public even while laying the groundwork for a future where selfdrivin­g cars meet their full potential.

Mark Rosenker, chairman of the National Transporta­tion Safety Board from 2006-09, heads the Commission on Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Safety at Securing America’s Future Energy. Amitai Bin-Nun is the vice president of Autonomous Vehicles and Mobility Innovation at SAFE.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States