USA TODAY US Edition

There are way more bots on Twitter than you thought

Bots send 66% of tweets linking to digital content

- Mike Snider

There’s a lot of bots out there on

Twitter.

That’s the message from a new Pew Research Center study, out Monday, which found that two-thirds of tweets that link to digital content are generated by bots — accounts powered by automated software, not real tweeters.

Researcher­s analyzed 1.2 million tweets from last summer (July 27-Sept.

11), most of which linked to more than

2,300 popular websites devoted to sports, celebritie­s, news, business and sites created by organizati­ons.

Two-thirds (66%) of those tweets were posted or shared by bots, and even more,

89%, of links that led to aggregatio­n sites that compile stores posted online were posted by bots, the study says.

The findings suggest that bots “play a prominent and pervasive role in the social media environmen­t,” said Aaron Smith, associate research director at Pew, which used a “Botometer” devel- oped at the University of Southern California and Indiana University to analyze links and determine if they were posted by an automated account.

“Automated accounts are far from a niche phenomenon: They share a significan­t portion of tweeted links to even the most prominent and mainstream publicatio­ns and online outlets,” Smith said in comments accompanyi­ng the study. “Since these accounts can impact the informatio­n people see on social media, it is important to have a sense of their overall prevalence on social media.”

The Pew researcher­s did not attempt to assess the accuracy of the material shared by the bots. Also not determined: whether the bots were “good” or “bad” or “whether the content shared by automated accounts is truthful informatio­n or not, or the extent to which users interact with content shared by suspected bots,” Stefan Wojcik, a computatio­nal social scientist, said in the study. Other findings about bots:

❚ Bots were responsibl­e for about

90% of all tweeted links to popular adult content websites, 76% of popular sports sites and 66% to news and current events sites.

❚ Some bots do more work than others. The 500 most-active suspected bot accounts sent 22% of tweeted links to popular news and current events sites. In comparison, the 500 most-active human tweeters sent about 6% of links to the outlets.

❚ Bot accounts with a political bias were equally liberal or conservati­ve.

Bots have long plagued Twitter, and other researcher­s have estimated as many as 15% of all Twitter accounts could be fake. Twitter has said the number is lower.

Twitter’s rules allow automated software but ban the posting of misleading or abusive content or spam. In February, Twitter suspended multiple accounts following the indictment by special counsel Robert Mueller of Russian nationals for meddling in the U.S. election, including using fake Twitter accounts to wage “informatio­n warfare” against the U.S.

The social network also attempts to remove deliberate­ly manipulati­ve tweets and offered details about that process Friday in an online post from Del Harvey, Twitter’s vice president for trust and safety.

During last Tuesday’s shooting at YouTube headquarte­rs in San Bruno, Calif., Twitter began to see accounts “deliberate­ly sharing deceptive, malicious informatio­n, sometimes organizing on other networks to do so,” Harvey says.

That activity is typical as informatio­n about tragedies emerges and presents “an especially difficult and volatile challenge” in how to respond to “people who are deliberate­ly manipulati­ng the conversati­on on Twitter in the immediate aftermath of tragedies like this,” she says.

Twitter “should not be the arbiter of truth,” Harvey says, but the network does have rules against abusive behavior, hateful conduct, violent threats, spam and against suspended users creating new accounts.

In recent months, Twitter has improved its tools and ability to respond to manipulati­ve activity on the service, she says. After the YouTube shooting, “we immediatel­y started requiring account owners to remove Tweets — many within minutes of their initial creation — for violating our policies on abusive behavior,” she says. “We also suspended hundreds of accounts for harassing others or purposely manipulati­ng conversati­ons about the event.”

Automated systems also helped prevent suspended tweeters from creating new accounts.

 ?? TWITTER ??
TWITTER

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States