USA TODAY US Edition

Gorsuch joins liberals on deportatio­n ruling

Trump’s Supreme Court nominee helps hand administra­tion defeat

- Richard Wolf

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a law subjecting non-citizens to deportatio­n for crimes of violence is unconstitu­tionally vague, handing the Trump administra­tion a defeat — thanks to the vote of Justice Neil Gorsuch.

President Trump’s nominee to the high court joined most of the ruling by the court’s liberal minority, agreeing that the law failed to define what would qualify as a violent crime. He based his conclusion on a similar decision written in 2015 by his predecesso­r, Justice Antonin Scalia.

Vague laws, Gorsuch wrote, “can invite the exercise of arbitrary power ... by leaving the people in the dark about what the law demands and allowing prosecutor­s and courts to make it up. The law before us today is such a law.”

The majority opinion, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was a victory for James Garcia Dimaya, whose two burglary conviction­s were considered violent crimes under the statute — despite not having involved violence. It was a defeat for the Justice Depart- ment, which defended the law under the Trump and Obama administra­tions.

“The void-for-vagueness doctrine, as we have called it, guarantees that ordi- nary people have ‘fair notice’ of the conduct a statute proscribes,” Kagan wrote. “And the doctrine guards against arbitrary or discrimina­tory law enforcemen­t by insisting that a statute provide standards to govern the actions of police officers, prosecutor­s, juries and judges.”

The court’s other four conservati­ves dissented in two separate opinions totaling 47 pages — more than Kagan and Gorsuch wrote for the majority.

“Today’s holding invalidate­s a provision of the Immigratio­n and Nationalit­y Act ... on which the government relies to ‘ensure that dangerous criminal aliens are removed from the United States,’ ” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.

Justice Clarence Thomas warned that the court’s decision could lead to “the invalidati­on of scores of similarly worded state and federal statutes.”

Department of Homeland Security spokesman Tyler Houlton said the ruling “significan­tly undermines DHS’s efforts to remove aliens convicted of certain violent crimes, including sexual assault, kidnapping and burglary.”

The case was carried over from the high court’s 2016-17 term after Scalia’s death. Having only eight members, the court was unable to render a decision, and the case was reschedule­d. Gorsuch was confirmed to the court last April.

Vague laws “can invite the exercise of arbitrary power ... by leaving the people in the dark about what the law demands and allowing prosecutor­s and courts to make it up.” Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court justice

 ?? SAIT SERKAN GURBUZ/AP ??
SAIT SERKAN GURBUZ/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States