USA TODAY US Edition

Report cites failure in Afghanista­n

Inspector general: Billions wasted, thousands killed, corruption thrives

- Tom Vanden Brook

WASHINGTON – The U.S. government’s 17-year effort to stabilize parts of war-torn Afghanista­n has mostly failed, according to a report released Thursday by the Special Inspector General for Afghanista­n Reconstruc­tion.

The damning report finds that much of the $4.7 billion spent on programs to stabilize areas cleared of insurgents was largely wasted — some of it siphoned off by corrupt officials, some of it paying for projects that did more harm than good. All told, the U.S. government has appropriat­ed about $126 billion to rebuild the country, most of it to train and equip security forces.

“The large sums of stabilizat­ion dollars the United States devoted to Afghanista­n in search of quick gains often exacerbate­d conflicts, enabled corruption and bolstered support for insurgents,” the report says.

After toppling the ruling Taliban in Afghanista­n in 2001, U.S., allied and Afghan forces sought to establish a stable country where al-Qaeda terrorists would find no harbor.

Thursday’s report follows one issued this week by the Pentagon’s inspector general that found little progress in providing security for the Afghan people.

According to Thursday’s report, bad strategy and policies in Afghanista­n led to billions wasted, more than 2,200 U.S. troops killed and a dysfunctio­nal country left behind. The problems stemmed in part from U.S. officials focusing efforts on the most dangerous parts of the country and seeking to get out too fast.

President Obama sent 50,000 U.S. troops to Afghanista­n in 2009 and 2010 to the most dangerous parts of Afghan- istan. At the same time Obama ordered more forces to Afghanista­n, he set a deadline for their withdrawal. This “surge,” patterned in part after a similar escalation in Iraq, was intended to tamp down the Taliban insurgency and allow the government to grow, but the strategy did not provide enough security, nor did it last long enough to allow Afghans to take over.

Instead of bolstering the government, the gusher of cash flooded the impoverish­ed country with money that could not be spent fast enough.

Of the $4.7 billion spent, $2.4 billion went to programs administer­ed by USAID and $2.3 billion was spent on the Pentagon’s Commander’s Emergency Response Program.

The military measured success in how much money was spent rather than its impact, according to the report. The commander’s funds, money that officers in the field could dole out for projects, rose from $40 million in 2004 to $550 million in 2009.

Deadlines for drawing down troops and leaving Afghanista­n entirely in 2014, a goal that wasn’t achieved, eroded belief in the staying power of the U.S.-led coalition and the Afghan government.

“Stabilizat­ion requires time to measure and adapt, and we lost all that,” John Allen, the former top U.S. commander in Afghanista­n, told investigat­ors. “It was pulled out from under us.”

About 15,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanista­n.

“Stabilizat­ion requires time to measure and adapt, and we lost all that. It was pulled out from under us.”

John Allen Former top U.S. commander in Afghanista­n

 ?? MUHAMMAD SADIQ/EPA-EFE ?? Afghan security officials inspect the scene of a bomb explosion in Kandahar, Afghanista­n, on Tuesday. Several people were killed when a container full of explosives blew up as security forces tried to defuse it.
MUHAMMAD SADIQ/EPA-EFE Afghan security officials inspect the scene of a bomb explosion in Kandahar, Afghanista­n, on Tuesday. Several people were killed when a container full of explosives blew up as security forces tried to defuse it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States