Trump insults prompt Canadian boycotts
Neighbors to the north fight back against tariffs
Northern neighbors respond to tariffs by avoiding American products
Natalie McLellan no longer stocks Heinz ketchup, Florida oranges or any other foods that come from the U.S. at her home in LaSalle, Ontario. ❚ The 42-year-old autism consultant is one of a growing number of Canadians who are boycotting U.S. products, a decision motivated by President Donald Trump’s anti-Canadian sentiments and tough trade stance. ❚ “I really don’t feel comfortable supporting our neighbors,” McLellan said. “It seems Trump and the politicians and the people of your country who stand behind him don’t want to have a global community.”
The U.S. has imposed tariffs on Canadian lumber, steel and aluminum. As Trump left the Group of 7 meeting of industrial nations in Quebec on June 9, he criticized Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in a tweet, calling him “very dishonest & weak” for pushing back against the tariffs.
Trump withdrew the U.S. from a joint document that summarized what was agreed to at the G-7 summit. Now, hashtags such as #Boycott USA, #BuyCanadian and #VacationCanada – and their French equivalents in the bilingual nation – are bubbling among patriotic Canadians.
Some in the nation known as much for its politeness as its love of hockey are avoiding everything American, whether it is fresh and packaged food, U.S.-based retailers and chain restaurants, appliances, cars or travel destinations.
For household staples, McLellan opts for either similar Canadian-made products or does without. She has turned to the internet to help her find non-American products. She’s canceling plans for trips to see Detroit’s professional sports teams, such as MLB’s Tigers, the NFL’s Lions and the NHL’s Red Wings.
Canada is the U.S.’s second-largest trading partner behind China. U.S. goods and services trade with Canada totaled an estimated $673.9 billion in 2017 – $341.2 billion in exports and $332.8 billion in imports – the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said.
The U.S. is Canada’s biggest trading partner, so a boycott risks veering into “this will hurt me more than it’ll hurt you” territory. Yet some Canadians are determined to see it through.
For Toronto property developer Vivienne Grace Ziner, the commitment to avoid American building materials and plumbing fixtures for her real-estate projects means spending as much as 50 percent more.
“Trump changed the rules. He start- ed slapping on tariffs. It’s illogical, and its detrimental to all of us,” Ziner said. “The more intransigent he would get, the more intransigent I would get.”
The results of mass boycotts are mixed, but they certainly can draw attention to an issue. The bus boycott in Montgomery, Alabama, pointed to the civil rights struggle in the mid-1950s. The United Farm Workers union made an impact with its grapes boycott in the late 1960s. The anti-apartheid boycott of South Africa lasted for years, and a boycott was organized around last year’s transgender bathroom-bill boycott in North Carolina. Others fail to make a real difference. “They tend to be short-lived, passion-of-the-moment affairs. They certainly do perform an important expressive role,” said George Loewenstein, a Carnegie Mellon University behavioral economist.
There’s talk of more countries joining in a more generalized boycott.
“Trump is playing a dangerous game. He’s getting the world angry at the U.S.,” Loewenstein said. “Canada might not be able to unilaterally act against the U.S., but if a lot of countries unite against the U.S., they could do some real economic damage.”