USA TODAY US Edition

Yes, give us strength. Also guile, conceit, anger

Women never thought we’d have to ask Hollywood for flaws

- Andrea Mandell

The message seems to have gotten muddled.

As #MeToo and Time’s Up have worked to move the culture forward with twin goals of making workplaces safer for women and closing the pay gap, a curious thing has happened in Hollywood.

Good news first: Screenwrit­ers are learning that not all women are downer wives, hot girlfriend­s or shrews. But in a knee-jerk reaction to the times, Hollywood is trying to make up for lost ground, trumpeting every female character as a “strong female lead,” someone who’s a pitch-perfect blend of tough resolve, intellect and conviction in a man’s world.

It’s not only grating, it’s ... weak. “Every time someone writes that I play ‘strong women,’ what they’re implying is that most women aren’t,” Jessica Chastain tweeted last year while promoting “Molly’s Game.” “How about I just play well-written parts?”

We’re on board for mischievou­s, multidimen­sional and maddening. Give us messy, give us miserable, give us monstrous. Just don’t try to fake us out with the notion that female strength is a fad.

What screenwrit­ers and filmmakers often lose sight of is nuance: Women at the center of their own stories who contain multitudes. What makes someone bad? What makes them good? And aren’t most people ( women and men) an ever-shifting balance of both?

It’s why I’ve been so insistent about getting my circle to watch BBC America’s “Killing Eve.” Sandra Oh’s spy, Eve Polastri, on whom the series hinges, is constantly evolving in her pursuit of a

“Every time someone writes that I play ‘strong women,’ what they’re implying is that most women aren’t. How about I just play well written parts?” Jessica Chastain

female Russian serial killer. She’s sharp, brings snacks to semi-important meetings, gets in too deep with her target and sometimes takes her partner for granted. (She also happens to be good as hell at her job.)

There are bright spots on the silver screen, too. Evangeline Lilly finally gets a superhero suit in “Ant-Man and the Wasp” (out Friday). But what I was happier to see — along with the Wasp’s equal billing (which came as a surprise even to Lilly, she told me) — is how much depth her Hope Van Dyne has, from her quick wit and encycloped­ic knowledge of quantum physics to the pain she displays rememberin­g a sweet childhood spent with her now-MIA mother.

Hope feels real, even when she shrinks down to the size of a bug.

But the wins make the errors all the more glaring. Look at “Ocean’s 8,” (a film chock-full of women’s stories), which came in at a B-plus on CinemaScor­e — not a great grade from audiences, who tend to reward blockbuste­rs on a curve.

Why? The script was maddeningl­y undercooke­d. I left the theater far more interested in Mindy Kaling flexing as a millennial jeweler and Awkwafina’s sticky-fingered huckster than top-billed Cate Blanchett and Sandra Bullock.

Not that I blamed those actresses: Their roles weren’t written as well. Who was Blanchett, other than a shaggyhair­ed bar owner skimming profits and watering down her vodka? Who was Bullock, other than Danny Ocean’s scheming sister who was smart enough to pull off a intricate Met Gala heist but too smitten to see her former beau for the double-crossing crook that he was?

Their characters were one-dimensiona­l stereotype­s, and I didn’t buy it.

So we celebrate the wins; the projects that put forth the real in a world that defaults to the male gaze. This spring, the teen girls of “Blockers” debated the future of their virgin status and took on their overbearin­g parents without a hint of Valley Girl whining.

“I often felt like (Valley Girl speech) is when men are writing women, because that’s how they hear young women,” director Kay Cannon told me, describing how the script depicted the characters. “The young women I’m talking to, that’s not how they talk.”

Charlize Theron, working off a script by Diablo Cody, took on the complexiti­es of being an overwhelme­d mom of three who drops the juggling act in “Tully.”

“I’ve seen a lot of depictions of, like, the control-freak mom. I think that’s been played for laughs a lot,” Cody told USA TODAY. “You know, the woman who wants everything done a certain way and is obsessed with nobody touching the baby and so on.

“And I hadn’t seen the other side of that coin, which is a mom who is so distracted and underwater that she accidental­ly bangs the baby’s car seat into the wall or drops her phone on the baby while she’s changing her diaper. … Maybe we needed some representa­tion.”

The key is ditching buzzwords and delivering realistic, complex women to actual, multifacet­ed audiences made up of 50 percent women. We don’t need a Netflix queue labeled “Strong Female Roles” (a real thing, and please point me to a queue of “Strong Male Roles” because I haven’t seen it).

We need an influx of women we relate to. Just save us the strong spiel.

 ?? FOCUS FEATURES ?? Exhausted mom Marlo (Charlize Theron) is overwhelme­d and not afraid to say so in “Tully.”
FOCUS FEATURES Exhausted mom Marlo (Charlize Theron) is overwhelme­d and not afraid to say so in “Tully.”
 ?? BBC AMERICA ?? Spy Eve Polastri (Sandra Oh) is good at her job hunting a killer, flaws and all, on “Killing Eve.”
BBC AMERICA Spy Eve Polastri (Sandra Oh) is good at her job hunting a killer, flaws and all, on “Killing Eve.”
 ?? BEN ROTHSTEIN ?? Hope Van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly) gets depth – and equal billing – in “Ant-Man and The Wasp.”
BEN ROTHSTEIN Hope Van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly) gets depth – and equal billing – in “Ant-Man and The Wasp.”
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? It’s not their fault, but Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett just weren’t that interestin­g in “Ocean’s 8,” the victims of a so-so script.
It’s not their fault, but Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett just weren’t that interestin­g in “Ocean’s 8,” the victims of a so-so script.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States