USA TODAY US Edition

Deal remains hazardous to our health

- Michael Brune Michael Brune is executive director of the Sierra Club.

Despite a new name, President Donald Trump’s trade accord with Canada and Mexico would perpetuate the damage NAFTA has caused to communitie­s across North America. A pro-polluter trade proposal by another name is still a threat to our health and livelihood­s.

This NAFTA 2.0 would encourage further outsourcin­g of pollution and jobs, give handouts to corporate polluters like Chevron and ExxonMobil, and cement Trump’s polluting legacy for years after he has left office. It fails to mention climate change and would actually prolong NAFTA’s contributi­on to the climate crisis by promoting fossil fuel developmen­t.

The lack of binding environmen­tal standards in the deal would allow more corporatio­ns to evade hard-fought U.S. environmen­tal protection­s by shifting jobs, emissions and toxic pollution to Mexico. For example, the proposal fails to include a single binding standard to stop corporatio­ns from exporting lead waste to Mexico — where standards are 10 times weaker — instead of recycling it in the U.S. This pollution-outsourc- ing loophole has cost the U.S. recycling jobs and poisoned the air of border communitie­s. Closing it will require strong environmen­tal and labor standards, not climate denial, weak words and a failed enforcemen­t system.

The proposal falls far short of the minimum changes necessary to curb NAFTA’s threats to wildlife, clean air and water, and the health of our communitie­s. It preserves rules that would lock in gas exports, encourage fracking, and allow corporate polluters to challenge clean energy policies. It even rolls back standards included in past trade pacts to reinforce internatio­nal agreements protecting everything from wetlands to sea turtles.

Meanwhile, the proposal’s new propollute­r rules — not found in NAFTA — could make it more difficult to reverse Trump’s environmen­tal rollbacks.

Our communitie­s will suffer if this proposal, which was hastily finalized to score political points, remains as is. We need a replacemen­t for NAFTA that prioritize­s people and the planet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States