USA TODAY US Edition

TRUMP ORDERS US FORCES OUT OF SYRIA

❚ President: US mission should end, ISIS has lost ❚ Some GOP senators, Pentagon oppose move ❚ Russia sees opening for political solution

- Tom Vanden Brook and David Jackson

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump called Wednesday for a U.S. withdrawal from Syria over the apparent objections of military advisers and a bipartisan group of lawmakers.

The withdrawal of the more than 2,000 troops is based on Trump’s decision that the mission against ISIS is complete, a U.S. official told USA TODAY.

Military leaders, including Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, in recent weeks and months have spoken of the need for U.S. troops to remain in the eastern part of the country to help stabilize it and allow for peace negotiatio­ns to proceed.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., derided the decision to withdraw, likening it to those made by President Barack Obama to announce ahead of time plans to reduce forces in Iraq and Afghanista­n.

“Withdrawal of this small American force in Syria would be a huge Obama-like mistake,” Graham tweeted.

In a statement, Graham added that Trump’s action would represent a “big win for ISIS, Iran, Bashar al Assad of Syria, and Russia.”

“I fear it will lead to devastatin­g consequenc­es for our nation, the region, and throughout the world,” Graham said.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., tweeted that the move was a “major blunder” and against the Pentagon’s

advice. New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, top Democrat on the Foreign Relations panel, called it a “dangerous decision” that would destabiliz­e the region, endanger Kurdish allies and embolden America’s enemies.

“We’re leaving the Kurds at risk, we’re creating a vacuum, and we’re doing it in a way that puts Israel at risk” because of Iran’s presence in Syria, Menendez said.

In Russia, a foreign ministry spokespers­on said Trump’s decision could help create “a real prospect for a political solution” in Syria, according to TASS, the Russian state-owned news agency.

Trump’s announceme­nt should not surprise anybody because he has promised it, according to a senior administra­tion official who was not authorized to speak publicly. The official would not say why Trump apparently didn’t inform high-ranking officials of his decision. The Pentagon is developing the timeline for the removal of troops.

The U.S. will continue to pressure Assad and his Iranian allies, the official said, but referred questions to the Pentagon about whether U.S. warplanes would continue to attack Islamic State targets.

In statements later Wednesday, White House and Pentagon spokeswome­n equivocate­d on the “defeat” of the Islamic State that Trump referred to.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the U.S. has “defeated the territoria­l caliphate.”

“These victories over ISIS in Syria do not signal the end of the Global Coalition or its campaign,” Sanders said in a statement. “We have started returning United States troops home as we transition to the next phase of this campaign.” She did not offer details on what the next phase was.

Dana White, the chief Pentagon spokeswoma­n, went even further, saying the fight against the Islamic State continues. “The Coalition has liberated the ISIS-held territory, but the campaign against ISIS is not over,” White said in a statement.

Yet in his tweet earlier Wednesday, Trump declared victory.

“We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency,” he wrote.

Despite Trump’s assertion, fighting by U.S.-led forces continues in Syria. On Saturday, warplanes struck ISIS targets 47 times, U.S. Central Command announced early Wednesday.

According to a report by the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies, the Islamic State is far from obliterate­d. The Washington-based think tank estimates 20,000 to 30,000 militants may still be in Iraq and Syria.

As recently as last week, officials said U.S. troops may need a longer stay to ensure that the military’s accomplish­ments are “enduring.”

“I think it’s fair to say Americans will remain on the ground after the physical defeat of the caliphate,” said Brett McGurk, special presidenti­al envoy for the global coalition.

Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declined earlier in December to put a timeline on withdrawal of U.S. troops.

“We still have a long way to go, and so I’d be reluctant to give a fixed time,” Dunford said in a forum held by The Washington Post.

In September, Mattis told reporters that declaring victory and leaving Syria would be a mistake.

“I think that getting rid of the caliphate doesn’t mean you then blindly say OK, we got rid of it, march out, and then wonder why the caliphate comes back and how many times have we seen – look at even Iraq where they’re still on the hunt for them. And they’re still trying to come back.”

 ?? DELIL SOULEIMAN/ AFP/GETTY IMAGES ?? A convoy of U.S. armored vehicles drives near the village of Yalanli, on the western outskirts of the northern Syrian city of Manbij, last year.
DELIL SOULEIMAN/ AFP/GETTY IMAGES A convoy of U.S. armored vehicles drives near the village of Yalanli, on the western outskirts of the northern Syrian city of Manbij, last year.
 ?? HUSSEIN MALLA/AP ?? A U.S. soldier, left, sits on an armored vehicle behind a sand barrier at a newly installed position in Manbij, northern Syria, in April.
HUSSEIN MALLA/AP A U.S. soldier, left, sits on an armored vehicle behind a sand barrier at a newly installed position in Manbij, northern Syria, in April.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States