USA TODAY US Edition

CFL might hold answer to NFL replay problem

- Tom Schad

Delvin Breaux watched the now-infamous no-call live from Section 102 at Mercedes-Benz Superdome, about six rows up from field level. He saw Nickell Robey-Coleman collide with Tommylee Lewis and wondered, incredulou­sly, why Saints coach Sean Payton wasn’t challengin­g the missed pass interferen­ce call.

“Man, that’s BS!” Breaux thought. “Come on Payton, throw the challenge flag out there!”

Payton, of course, couldn’t challenge the play, because pass interferen­ce is not reviewable in the NFL. But there was good reason for Breaux’s confusion. The New Orleans native — and former Saints cornerback — now plays with the Hamilton Tiger-Cats of the Canadian Football League, so he’s grown accustomed to the CFL’s way of doing things.

“I got all caught up in the moment,” he recalled to USA TODAY last week, “and forgot this is the NFL.”

As the NFL’s competitio­n committee prepares to meet in Indianapol­is on Monday to discuss potential rule changes for 2019 — and as that missed call in the NFC Championsh­ip Game still lingers over the league — Breaux is one of several current and former CFL players and coaches who believes Canada can offer a solution.

They say the NFL should follow the lead of its northern neighbors and add pass interferen­ce to the list of plays that can be challenged by coaches and reviewed by replay.

“When that play happened, that’s the first thing I thought of,” Breaux said. “I think it’d be awesome to put into the NFL.”

The CFL has allowed coaches to challenge offensive or defensive pass interferen­ce since 2014. Though CFL coaches only get one challenge — as opposed to two in the NFL — they are allowed to challenge these penalties, whether they’re called, just like an incomplete catch or a player stepping out of bounds.

The result: According to league statistics, 41 of the CFL’s 72 coaches’ challenges in 2018 involved pass interferen­ce calls or non-calls. And more than half of those challenged penalties (21) were overturned.

“I think it’s a good rule,” said Montreal Alouettes coach Mike Sherman, who previously worked as a head coach with the Packers and Texas A&M. “I think I threw the flag five times (this year), only won one of them. But you just don’t know if that one is going to determine whether you win the Super Bowl — or the Grey Cup, or the national championsh­ip, or whatever the case may be.”

Sherman’s argument — that one incorrect call could have significan­t consequenc­es — has been echoed by some of his NFL counterpar­ts for years, long before the Saints-Rams no-call helped send the Rams to the Super Bowl.

Patriots coach Bill Belichick and coach-turned-broadcaste­r Rex Ryan are among those who have previously urged the league to expand the challenge system to include penalties such as pass interferen­ce. Formal proposals to that effect have been voted down by owners each time.

“I just want to get it right,” Ryan told reporters in 2016, when his proposal to expand instant-replay challenges was rejected. “You don’t want to lose a game based on a call.”

The Associated Press reported the competitio­n committee — which, notably, includes Payton — will again consider potential changes to the replay review system this offseason. Any recommende­d changes would need to be approved by 24 of the league’s 32 owners.

For their part, players who have spent time in the NFL and CFL told USA TODAY they vastly prefer the CFL’s system, even if it doesn’t benefit them personally at times.

Tiger-Cats wide receiver Brandon Banks, who spent three seasons with the Redskins, said he was concerned that challengin­g pass interferen­ce calls might slow down the game, but he would still prefer it to the NFL’s rule because “at the end of the day, the call is right.” Breaux, a two-time CFL all-star, said it’s “by far” the one CFL rule the NFL should employ.

“I’ve been called on it before when I was in the CFL,” said former Edmonton Eskimos wide receiver Duke Williams, who signed a contract with the Bills last month. “I didn’t like it, but it was a fair rule.”

Banks, Breaux and Sherman also said they’d like to see the NFL adopt the CFL’s “halo rule,” which gives punt returners a 5-yard radius to safely field a punt and attempt to return it.

But they said making pass interferen­ce plays reviewable — and avoiding another Saints-Rams fiasco — would be a great place to start.

“It’s a call that the officials on the field see much better than everybody else,” Sherman said. “But if for some reason one is just totally missed, at least you’ve got it covered.”

 ?? DERICK E. HINGLE/USA TODAY SPORTS ?? A pass interferen­ce no-call in the Rams-Saints NFC Championsh­ip Game might prompt a change to the replay rules.
DERICK E. HINGLE/USA TODAY SPORTS A pass interferen­ce no-call in the Rams-Saints NFC Championsh­ip Game might prompt a change to the replay rules.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States