USA TODAY US Edition

70 years ago, NATO saved the world

Trump and GOP must recognize we still need it

- Tom Nichols

BERLIN — I was walking with my wife here in a cold, intermitte­nt rain. I had just visited the Soviet War Memorial in the Tiergarten, not far from the Brandenbur­g Gate. We were quiet after standing before the final resting place of thousands of men who had once been our allies in the fight against the Nazis. We headed toward the Ebertstras­se, where the Berlin Wall once divided the city. Tourists and students now milled about taking selfies in places they would have been arrested or even shot within my adult lifetime.

Perhaps it was the weather, or the cemetery’s grim but majestic statue of the Red Army soldier standing guard over his fallen comrades, but I found myself contemplat­ing the chilling thought that if we had destroyed the planet in a thermonucl­ear war, it would likely have started not far from where my wife and I were now strolling.

Other wars may yet come. But we live today in an unpreceden­ted period of peace and global cooperatio­n, a miracle of survival we owe to the dedication and courage of a band of democracie­s that pledged to defend each other by signing the founding documents of the North Atlantic Treaty Organizati­on 70 years ago today in Washington.

It seems strange now to say NATO saved the world. Most people have no idea what NATO is, or why it exists. In America, President Donald Trump has tried to depict NATO as a scam or a racket, in which lazy Europeans collect American largess while doing nothing for themselves. Worse, Republican­s who once cheered as President Ronald Reagan stood in Berlin and challenged Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall now meekly nod when Trump attacks our own allies in NATO. It’s a sign of how far Republican­s — and Americans — have estranged themselves from one of the greatest diplomatic achievemen­ts in history.

A new Russian threat

This is not only a tragedy but also a danger, because we face a similar, if scaled-down, threat from the Russia of Vladimir Putin as we did from the old Soviet Union.

The Soviets, in their day, could not conquer and hold all of Europe. They had every intention, however, of attacking the Western outpost in divided Berlin and driving deep into Western Europe. They assumed the Americans and their allies would surrender to Moscow’s demands rather than face columns of Soviet tanks headed for Paris, Brussels and Copenhagen.

This was more than a hypothetic­al danger. In 1965, Soviet military leaders raised the possibilit­y of attacking West Berlin in retaliatio­n for American moves against North Vietnam and in the Caribbean as a means of making the Americans back down and retreat. But because of NATO, an attack in Germany meant courting war not only with the United States but also with Canada and much of Europe. The result would have been a military nightmare that would have carried the immense risk of an eventual nuclear disaster.

Today, the Kremlin regime still identifies America and NATO as its chief enemies. Like his predecesso­rs, Putin is not under any illusion that he can create a new Russian empire from the southern shores of Italy to the ice fields of Norway. Rather, he is addicted to using force around Russia’s borders. Like every autocrat facing his twilight years, Putin is fanning the flames of nationalis­m and turning the screws of military adventuris­m as a way of keeping himself and his cabal in power.

There is only one thing that can stand in his way: NATO.

Trump’s derelictio­n of duty

NATO’s history is not perfect. It endured a near-divorce with France, a Greek detour through a military dictatorsh­ip and a storm of public opposition to modernizin­g NATO nuclear forces overcome only by the close working relationsh­ip among Reagan, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and other Atlanticis­t leaders in Europe and Canada. And yet in 2019, books about the Soviet Union and “East Germany” gather dust in my office while NATO celebrates 70 years as the guarantor of European security.

Sadly, this platinum anniversar­y is marred by Trump’s hostility to our most important alliance. The president does not know why NATO exists and cannot comprehend the notion of an alliance because he is unable to grasp anything that does not offer to turn a profit. But Trump’s derelictio­n of his duty as NATO’s leader should not prevent the rest of us from marking this milestone with respect and gratitude.

Every person who now walks the streets of Berlin — and Toronto, London, Athens and yes, even New York and Seattle and every small town in between — should reflect that they do so freely. They do not live in fear, as many of us once did, that every problem in the world will fall into the dark gravitatio­nal pull of a divided Europe and lead to the end of human civilizati­on.

Instead of writing another premature obituary to the most powerful alliance ever formed, NATO’s half-billion citizens must find the fortitude to oppose yet another Kremlin regime that seems incapable of living at peace with its neighbors. Previous generation­s accepted that challenge. So must we.

Tom Nichols is a national security professor at the Naval War College, a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributo­rs and author of “The Death of Expertise.” The views expressed here are solely his own.

WANT TO COMMENT? Have Your Say at letters@usatoday.com, @usatodayop­inion on Twitter and facbook.com/usatodayop­inion. Comments are edited for length and clarity. Content submitted to USA TODAY may appear in print, digital or other forms. For letters, include name, address and phone number. Letters may be mailed to 7950 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA, 22108.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States