USA TODAY US Edition

Biodefense strategy has a long, tangled history

Decades of warnings, lessons failed in the end

- Dennis Wagner and Donovan Slack

Former U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman says it was as if Paul Revere rode across the country and no one paid attention.

For more than two decades, Robert Kadlec has warned leaders that the United States is not just vulnerable to a pandemic but doomed by dysfunctio­n if one were to strike.

Several years ago, his warnings gained traction.

Congress passed a law in 2016 mandating a federal plan to protect against contagious diseases.

In 2018, President Donald Trump adopted a National Biodefense Strategy. It largely followed recommenda­tions of a commission founded and directed by Kadlec, a retired Air Force colonel and physician who has held senior positions at the White House, Senate and Pentagon.

Kadlec was appointed to oversee preparedne­ss and response at the Department of Health and Human Services.

But the document approved by Trump was a blueprint, not a game plan. The ideas weren’t implemente­d before COVID-19 arrived in the USA. And the federal government’s response shows it.

One example: The government has been criticized for taking too long to create and distribute tests to detect the virus. There are shortages of medical supplies and equipment such as protective masks and ventilator­s. Anticipati­ng such shortages, the biodefense strategy calls for setting up excess manufactur­ing capacity to produce these necessitie­s quickly in an emergency.

The same biodefense strategy called for a Cabinet-level committee to oversee protection against contagious diseases, but it never met to discuss the coronaviru­s outbreak.

The Coronaviru­s Task Force created by Trump one month into the epidemic did not include Kadlec, the person who had warned of this sort of catastroph­e for years.

The nation’s biodefense network remains a labyrinth, according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, in which responsibi­lity is shared by at least 19 federal agencies, three executive offices, 50 political appointees and all state, local, tribal and territoria­l government­s. Their roles are codified in a dizzying mix of laws, directives and action plans.

The system is so complex, a Department of Energy lab used its policy mapping tool known as the “Spaghetti Monster” to illustrate the linkages.

The National Biodefense Strategy is supposed to untangle that mess. Among its sweeping goals: “Ensure decisionma­king is informed by intelligen­ce, forecastin­g, and risk assessment.” And “Rapidly respond to limit the impacts of bioinciden­ts.”

Lieberman and Asha George, executive director of the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense, said those objectives have not been implemente­d.

In February, in the heat of the coronaviru­s pandemic, the Government Accountabi­lity Office concluded the national strategy has “no clear, detailed processes, roles, and responsibi­lities for joint decision-making.”

Even the administra­tion’s messaging about coronaviru­s seemed to defy principles of the biodefense strategy. It calls for “timely, regular, coordinate­d, and consistent” communicat­ion to the public. On the same day this month,

Trump downplayed COVID-19, saying it is “something we have tremendous control over.” His top infectious-disease expert, Anthony Fauci, said it could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

“It really is a Pearl Harbor moment, and are we going to be able to gear up?” Lieberman asked. “Here we are now, it’s a crisis and maybe going to be a catastroph­e. … We’d be in a lot better shape if people had acted earlier.”

A senior administra­tion official, who refused to be identified because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said the biodefense strategy laid out a single, coordinate­d effort across the federal government for the first time, and its goals are being implemente­d in response to the coronaviru­s pandemic.

The administra­tion official said the steering committee outlined in the biodefense strategy was superseded by the Coronaviru­s Task Force. The official said Trump created the biodefense strategy to improve response time in situations such as the coronaviru­s pandemic, and it’s working.

20 years of warnings

In March 2019, Kadlec told Congress the nation’s biological protection system was understaff­ed by 2,000 workers. “Emerging disease outbreaks, particular­ly those with pandemic potential, are an internatio­nal flight away,” he said.

Ten months later, the novel coronaviru­s broke out of China and traveled halfway around the world to the USA. It was a chance to put strategy into action.

Over the years, Kadlec sounded his fears in sometimes apocalypti­c scenarios. He could not be reached for an interview for this story.

In 1998, Kadlec envisioned an anthrax assault on New York City. “Conservati­ve estimates put the number of deaths occurring in the first few days at 400,000,” the Vancouver Sun reported. “Beyond the immediate health implicatio­ns of such an attack, the potential panic and civil unrest would create an equally large response.”

In 2001, Kadlec anticipate­d a geneticall­y modified disease. “It’s not your mother’s smallpox,” he warned. “It’s an F-15 Stealth fighter – it’s designed to be undetectab­le, and to kill . ... We are flubbing our efforts at biodefense.”

His mission began with the Defense Department in the 1990s. He moved to the White House during the 2000s as director of biodefense on the Homeland Security Council and as a special assistant to President George W. Bush.

Kadlec repeatedly told Congress that U.S. biodefense plans were disastrous­ly flawed. No central leadership. Muddled national strategy. Insufficie­nt money, supplies and manpower.

In 2014, he founded a nonprofit organizati­on, the Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense, to attack the problem as a civilian. He persuaded Lieberman, an independen­t and former Democrat, and exHomeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, a Republican, to co-chair the effort.

That panel, renamed the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense, completed a scathing report in 2015 and sent it to President Barack Obama. “The Nation lacks the leadership, coordinati­on, collaborat­ion and innovation necessary to respond,” the commission wrote.

It proposed a blueprint for biodefense with clearly defined roles and the vice president in charge. It warned that pandemics carry “the possibilit­y of millions of fatalities and billions of dollars in economic losses.”

The report caught the eye of lawmakers. Just before Obama left office, Congress passed a law mandating the creation of a plan.

Trump released the National Biodefense Strategy in September 2018. By then, he had appointed Kadlec as an assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, in charge of preparatio­n and response.

Untangling the nation’s plans

In 2004, after the severe acute respirator­y syndrome (SARS) outbreak, President George W. Bush signed a directive that focused on biological weapons and addressed how to contain and treat infectious diseases.

Five years later, after the H1N1 epidemic, Obama issued his own strategy to combat “infectious diseases of natural, accidental, and deliberate origin.”

After Americans who traveled to West Africa contracted Ebola in 2014, biodefense responsibi­lity was still spread across Washington bureaucrac­ies.

Members of the blue-ribbon panel studied the system for a year. They concluded the nation’s risks from biological threats had reached “critical mass.”

The first of its 33 recommenda­tions in 2015 called for centralize­d command. Kadlec had argued for years that biodefense directives must come from the top – above Cabinet secretarie­s – and from someone who could take an active role.

“Leadership of biodefense should be institutio­nalized at the White House with the Vice President,” the report said.

Former homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco said the Obama administra­tion agreed with the spirit of that recommenda­tion, though not the letter. Near the end of his administra­tion, Obama created a unit within the National Security Council assigned full-time to disease preparedne­ss.

“In 2018, unfortunat­ely, that structure was dismantled,” Monaco said, referring to Trump’s decision to eliminate the White House pandemic office. Monaco is a member of the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense and a public health adviser to former Vice President Joe Biden, who seeks the Democratic nomination for president.

Strategy put to the test

Once a biodefense strategy was adopted, it was only a matter of time before it would be tested.

Trump designated a Cabinet-level steering committee to oversee its implementa­tion, but that committee has never met to confront COVID-19.

Instead, on Jan. 29, a day before the World Health Organizati­on declared a global emergency, the president announced a Coronaviru­s Task Force. That arrangemen­t isn’t mentioned in the Biodefense Strategy.

By Feb. 26, the virus had reached 37 countries outside China and establishe­d a foothold in the USA, where there were more than 50 known cases and countless undiagnose­d because of a shortage of test kits.

That day, Trump named Vice President Mike Pence to lead the task force.

Lieberman and George noted that the Coronaviru­s Task Force is dominated by White House advisers and Health and Human Services administra­tors, and one name is noticeably missing: Robert Kadlec, the federal health official responsibl­e for preparedne­ss and response. His boss, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, is on the task force.

The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to questions and an interview request.

On March 2, Kadlec was named to lead Health and Human Services’ response.

‘Hung up in the bureaucrac­y’

The next step after creating the biodefense strategy, George said, was to implement it and untangle all those laws, policies and duties. That got “hung up in the bureaucrac­y.”

“It didn’t really work,” she said, referring to the strategy. “I don’t know if ‘dismayed’ is the right word, but I look at what’s going on right now, and I just think, geez, there’s so much that could have been done in advance.

“It bothers me that people are going to get sick and die because we didn’t have plans and policies.”

By mid-March, Americans were panic-buying at supermarke­ts, wiping out supplies of toilet paper and pasta. Major cities shut down gathering places; some ordered residents to shelter in place.

Amid this turmoil, the GAO completed a review of the National Biodefense Strategy it began in 2018, well before COVID-19 emanated from a wet market in Wuhan, China.

As the disease spreads, the GAO said in a report to Congress, “the federal government must take necessary steps to protect the American public. … However, the Strategy is only as good as its implementa­tion.”

Friday, Trump defended the nation’s response to the pandemic: “This administra­tion inherited an obsolete, broken, old system that wasn’t meant for this. We discarded that system . ... And we’re very proud of what we’ve done.”

To which Kenneth Bernard, a former assistant surgeon general who wrote the 2004 biodefense plan under Bush, replied: “If it was broken, why didn’t you fix it two years ago?”

 ?? GREG LOVETT/THE PALM BEACH POST ?? Health care workers screen patients who will be tested for COVID-19 at the FoundCare drive-through testing station in Palm Springs, Fla., on Thursday.
GREG LOVETT/THE PALM BEACH POST Health care workers screen patients who will be tested for COVID-19 at the FoundCare drive-through testing station in Palm Springs, Fla., on Thursday.
 ?? TASOS KATOPODIS/GETTY IMAGES ?? Robert Kadlec, left, assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, has warned for years that the nation’s biodefense plans were disastrous­ly flawed.
TASOS KATOPODIS/GETTY IMAGES Robert Kadlec, left, assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, has warned for years that the nation’s biodefense plans were disastrous­ly flawed.
 ?? JACK GRUBER/USA TODAY ?? Robert Kadlec, assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, speaks of the federal interagenc­y response to the coronaviru­s on March 5.
JACK GRUBER/USA TODAY Robert Kadlec, assistant secretary of Health and Human Services, speaks of the federal interagenc­y response to the coronaviru­s on March 5.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States