US Army rethinks Confederate post names
10 forts across the South bear names of generals
WASHINGTON – Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy signaled their willingness to discuss scrapping Confederate names on forts across the country, Army Col. Sunset Belinsky said Monday evening.
They are open to having a bipartisan dialogue on renaming the bases, according to Belinsky.
The Army has 10 posts named after Con- federate generals across the South, including major installations at Fort Bragg in
North Carolina, Fort Benning in Georgia and
Fort Hood in Texas.
McCarthy, a former
Army Ranger, indicated his willingness to discuss the change after weeks of protests across the country in response to the death of George Floyd, a black man in Minneapolis who pleaded for his life as a white police officer knelt on his neck.
The Army has resisted calls to change names on installations named after officers who rebelled and fought against the U.S. government in the Civil War.
Times and attitudes are swiftly evolving as the nation heads into its second week of protests after Floyd’s death, calls for police reforms grow
and locations across the country announce plans to take down or remove Confederate memorials.
On Tuesday, the Navy announced that Adm. Mike Gilday, the chief of naval operations, plans to ban display of the Confederate battle flag from public work spaces on bases, ships, aircraft and submarines, said Commander Nate Christensen, Gilday’s spokesman.
“The order is meant to ensure unit cohesion, preserve good order and discipline, and uphold the Navy’s core values of honor, courage and commitment,” Christensen said in a statement.
Several retired generals, many of whom trained and commanded at the posts in question, said they supported name changes.
Retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, a former director of the CIA, wrote in The Atlantic that the names should be changed.
“These bases are, after all, installations, home to soldiers who swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Petraeus wrote. “The irony of training at bases named for those who took up arms against the United States, and for the right to enslave others, is inescapable to anyone paying attention.”
Sen. Jack Reed, the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, said Tuesday the Army is right to revisit changing the names of the forts.
“Changes are warranted,” Reed said. “Nobody can rewrite history, but it’s our duty to be honest about it and learn from it, and build a better future.”
Texas Rep. Mac Thornberry, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, said the Army should deal with the issue and leave politics out of it.
“I welcome Secretary McCarthy and the Army looking at this issue,” Thornberry said in a statement. “When it comes to the question of renaming installations or other assets, I believe that is something best left to the services and kept out of the political process.”
McCarthy acknowledged the racial division in a letter to soldiers and civilians June 3.
“Our ability to defend this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic, is founded upon a sacred trust with the American people,” McCarthy said. “Racial division erodes that trust.”
Last week, the Marine Corps banned the display of the Confederate battle flag.
The Navy operates a guided-missile cruiser, the USS Chancellorsville, named after a battle the Confederates won.