USA TODAY US Edition

Justices OK exemption to birth control coverage

Decision is the latest in battle over Affordable Care Act

- Richard Wolf

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that employers with religious or moral objections do not have to help provide insurance coverage for contracept­ives under the Affordable Care Act.

The ruling seeks to end a long-standing battle by the Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious groups that wanted no role in providing birth control coverage. It upholds a Trump administra­tion policy allowing for religious and moral exemptions. The decision was written by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas and joined by the other conservati­ves. Associate Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer agreed with the result but warned the battle may not be over. Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.

“For over 150 years, the Little Sisters have engaged in faithful service and sacrifice, motivated by a religious calling to surrender all for the sake of their brother,” Thomas said. “But for the past seven years, they – like many other religious objectors who have participat­ed in the litigation and rulemaking­s leading up to today’s decision – have had to fight for the ability to continue in their noble work without violating their sincerely held religious beliefs.”

Ginsburg issued a harsh rebuke to the court’s ruling. “Today, for the first time, the court casts totally aside countervai­ling rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree,” she said. “This court leaves women workers to fend for themselves, to seek contracept­ive coverage from sources other than their employer’s insurer, and, absent another available source of funding, to pay for contracept­ive services out of their own pockets.”

The case, which had confounded the justices for several years, represente­d the latest but not the last challenge to the Affordable Care Act a decade after its passage. The high court has upheld the law twice and will hear a third challenge in the fall – one in which the Trump administra­tion recommends the entire law be struck down.

It was one of three religious freedom cases heard by the court this term and won by conservati­ves. In June, the justices ruled that a state may not deny financial support for religious education if it has decided to provide such support for private secular schools. And also on Wednesday, it ruled that religious schools can fire teachers without being subject to job discrimina­tion lawsuits.

The Trump administra­tion acknowledg­ed that 75,000 to 125,000 women could lose employer coverage for contracept­ives but insisted many could get it through another program that includes restrictio­ns on abortion services. Without insurance, women can expect to pay $600 to $1,000 annually for oral contracept­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States